I would like to explain more about optional legal reviewer:
- it is only built on the front end
- It allows appeals
- It does not force everyone to enable
- Its censorship rules are set by the NNS
Since NNS has not encountered such attacks at present, I think how to solve the oligarch list and how to improve proposal participation is more important. Otherwise, NNS simply cannot formulate decentralized censorship rules.
Preventing most spam proposals only requires solving the reward problem and offensive proposals，No need to increase governance complexity.
If you think the proposal must be discussed in the forum, please write it in the review rules
If you think that the proposal cannot contain XX content, or follow the link to XX address, please write it in the review rules
Beyond that, are there any proposals that need to be blocked?
Periodic Confirmation of Neuron Followees can fix reward bug
But it cannot be implemented immediately, it needs to wait for development. And after the development is completed, you need to wait 6 months to see the effect, if it is passed, it is also necessary to immediately reset the current follower state to solve the current problems that need to be solved immediately.
Two Motion Proposals a Day to Double Your Earnings，If someone stakes more than 60,000 ICP, there is still an incentive to initiate spam proposals
Although the NNS has not encountered any offensive proposals at the moment, 10 ICPs are unable to block any malicious proposals
the rejection cost of 10 ICPs not only fails to solve any problems, but also increases the risk of NNS centralization