Dear ICP Community,
As we move forward with the DOXA SNS decentralization swap, we want to address recent discussions on this thread and provide clear boundaries regarding how we handle constructive feedback versus intentional malice.
1. Dedication to Transparency & Accountability
DOXA was built to foster real-world social impact and decentralized governance on the Internet Computer. We hear the honest questions from community members seeking clarity on our roadmap, fundraising allocations, and social impact verification. Transparent documentation and direct links to ongoing initiatives will continue to be updated in our public materials.
2. Addressing Targeted Malice & Misinformation
While open debate and skepticism are vital to governance, there is a clear distinction between constructive questioning and a targeted campaign to defame, malign, and sabotage the project’s reputation.
Certain accounts specifically @DHemingway, @Travka, @SumMonsterism, @Henn91, have repeatedly engaged in deliberate attempts to distort facts, spread false narratives, and damage DOXA’s standing in the community.
@Lorimer Is, has been a good reviewer but it seems has went beyond constructive review, criticism and feedback joining there action.
3. Official Notice on Potential Legal Action
We want to state unequivocally that the DOXA Foundation does not take harassment or defamatory claims lightly.
Following the completion of the SNS launch, the DOXA Foundation will review all public allegations, coordinated attacks, and false statements. Where appropriate, formal legal action will be pursued against individuals attempting to maliciously harm the project, its founders, or its community.
We encourage everyone to review our official documentation and judge the project based on verified facts. Let’s keep community governance focused on building, transparency, and long-term value.
On behalf Of,
DOXA Foundation.
