- Provide the code that has the right wasm hash for the nICP canisters
The last nICP ledger upgrade occured here: https://dashboard.internetcomputer.org/sns/jmod6-4iaaa-aaaaq-aadkq-cai/proposal/1867
It’s not up-to-date with the latest release: Releases · dfinity/ic · GitHub but built from commit fb3d35d0dddff7359acb8fb0faa9545759705768 in the IC repo.
This seems to be the thing you call everyone.
Ya know narcissistic projection.
While you obfuscate your control in other daos you realized that you couldn’t gain control in wtn. Other investors saw the opportunity and the vision and invested heavily.
It’s ironic that you use the “free market I can buy what I want.” Then turn around and throw this tantrum when someone richer decides to invest in a project.
Just because you are afraid of competition doesn’t mean you get to act like what you’re doing is good. No one wants nfts, they want daos and defi. Go build your game and participate in governance. These tantrums of yours are getting old.
Because they have no morals or ethics and adam does.
This is fundamentally wrong.
It adds value by locking more icp. And it adds value by letting the defi ecosystem have more liquid icp that can be used to trade, lend, and borrow.
You can go to defi lama and see the actual tvl increase because of wtn.
That’s wrong lol.
Adam flipped off and blew up in a neopets discord filled with children.
I guess this is where we fundamentally disagree.
Locking icp does not “add value” to the ecosystem. What adds value to the ecosystem is building products or services at which users are willing to interact with (at a net financial loss) because the experience or service they received was valueable to them. Icp gets burned facilitating these interactions. This is what “adds value”
This could be like playing a game, watching a movie, receiving a ticket to a real world event, whatever use your imagination.
Locking tokens is individual users sacrificing their liquidity in exhange for governance participation, to incentivize this they receive yield. The yield in diluting the supply but since the liquidity is locked, users have to purchase more tokens in order to interact with the eco… you seem to think this is a bad thing. I think this is a good thing because it means more buying pressure.
Wtn and similar products circumvent this fundamental architecture.
Locking icp directly impacts the tvl of the network.
I also find it weird that you argue so hard against wtn while your issue seems to be with the nns allowing and green lighting canister controlled neurons.
Wtn itself has done nothing wrong or against the rules that the nns allows for. Adam is just on a witch hunt to force out any other investors that will fund projects on the ic so he can have full control of the network.
The issue at hand is bigger than just wtn. And you’re on the wrong side of this all if you want to see more devs building on the ic.
Yes i believe this was a mistake WTN is just the first of many financial nuclear weapons that will be built.
You are watching and cheering for Adam to kick out nfid because he doesn’t like their investors, and also cheering for him attacking a defi product because he doesn’t like David fisher.
Adam has employed many different ways of hiding his control of sns daos such as ntn. He is pointing fingers trying to make something stick while this is all about him trying to be the gatekeeper of the entire network.
This harms the ecosystem and forces out devs that would build here. If you really want to see people building you should take a deeper look into what Adam is doing and why he is doing it.
Incorrect im an nfidw holder, and all my tokens are locked for 1 year. I have not profited one penny from any of adams dao conquests.
I urge other icp oligarchs to compete with adam and buy these daos. But they all sold while adam bought…except for wtn…weird… so who is the one who cares.
Over 2/3rd of all the ICP in DeFi is currently with WaterNeuron:
Another metric that goes unnoticed is fees, and revenue. WaterNeuron is #51 for holders revenue in the whole of crypto:
With nfid you must not be informed that the dev allocation is vesting.
Vesting tokens can’t increase their vp until the vesting period is over. So no they didn’t sell they acted in good faith and Adam is using that to take advantage of everyone’s ignorance on the details while pushing the narrative “dev should increase dissolve delay” when he knows that won’t affect anything.
Thanks for making a tool to track Adam’s neurons 
Doesn’t look like he is hiding behind anonymity, and he is pro-IC, so I wouldn’t say there is something to worry about.
I doubt you can imagine any attack vectors on the IC with Dragginz or Catalyze, or Swapmies.
On the other side, there are plenty with WTN. It can be used as a weapon.
You’ve kind of shown that he cares about the development of products, not about making zero-sum games that could eat the IC from the inside out.
To be fair, what NTN is building can also be weaponized, but I will stand against all kinds of nefarious usages with the lots of vp we have.
I am not arguing any of these points.
My point is that this TVL increase and holder revenue effect on the ecosystem comes at the expense of people who are not participating.
So the game theory result would be everyone with liquid tokens buying nICP. Which leads to all the voting power coalescing in the hands of 3 people, great result.
You keep missing the max vp at 10%
I know it’s hard to imagine a dao having just 2% more vp than Adam but that’s the reality as Dfinity is the one to green light this project.
It was a mistake and they should undo their mistake.
If @borovan and @infu build their own nuclear bomb, dont worry ill be here to say the same Thing.
When you say DeFi, I imagine nICP pools with other coins, not just staking.
If we count staking as DeFi then NNS has 99% of the DeFi
Infu and Adam already scammed the nns. Adam used multiple accounts to allow infu to get his ntn sale to pass and collect the community fund when there was no actual interest from the community.
I just dont care because i dont feel like NTN is hurting me or other retail investors. If you can explain how any NTN project would harm me other other retail investors do tell… i already made my case about wtn.
Like i said if infu builds a nuclear bomb and adam is the one holding the keys ill call them out too.
You can say the same about all SNSes, why pick NTN. Because we are trying to figure out what your favorite DAO is up to? Your combat stance in the forums and X with nothing interesting to show is getting old.
