New Node Provider Proposals

Roadmap
,
505

I voted to adopt since the documents meet the expectations even though as Louise pointed out that they are not linked in the correct part of the wiki. Unless there is an easy fix for that probably a new proposal would be the correct step.

3 Likes
506

Voted to adopt proposal 133135 since the requirements are met according to what was outlined here.

1 Like
507

An update was submitted (not accepted yet) to the forum, to link Protocol16 / Philip Hur self-declaration documents to the Self-Declaration overview.

If this edit gets accepted within time, I vote to adopt proposal 133135.

1 Like
508

The wikipage for Philip Hur has been added, and hashes check out okay. Link can be found here.

4 Likes
509

I vote to reject Proposal 133135.

While I have verified that the hashes provided for the self-declaration and proof of identity documents match, the proposal has several issues that must be addressed before I can support it.

  1. Proposal Name and Self-Declaration Mismatch : The proposal is for Protocol16 , but the self-declaration is under the name Philip Hur , which creates confusion about whether this is a company or an individual submission. This needs to be clarified before submission to avoid any ambiguity.
  2. Document Links : The links provided for the self-declaration and proof of identity do not point to actual files, which makes verification difficult. It’s worth noting that this issue seems to stem from a lack of clear instructions, which should be addressed for future proposals. Correctly functioning links are a core requirement for transparency and ease of review, and this remains a significant issue in the current submission.
  3. Proposal Completeness Upon Submission : I believe proposals should be correct and complete upon submission. While I understand all documents have now been provided, these issues should have been resolved before submission. A complete and accurate proposal is critical for ensuring the process is clear and consistent.
  4. Broader Process Critique : I strongly support developing tools to automate the verification of proposals, but this cannot be done if essential details such as correct links and documentation are missing from the payload. These tools would improve the efficiency and reliability of the process, but this proposal does not meet the necessary requirements to enable such improvements.
1 Like
510

Thanks for your help with this, @SvenF !

511

Hi @timk11 , thanks for voting to adopt the proposal! I am pursuing this as an individual. Let me know if you have any other questions.

1 Like