I’ll take this at face value and assume that it isn’t a troll post.
The existing standards and proposed standards, 7 as a foundation, 56, 59, 60, and 97 as extensions(See some links: NFT Working Group - Next Steps - ICRC-8, ICRC-56, ICRC-59, ICRC-60), are specifically crafted to give you the breadth for an implementation of this type(and many other types less emotionally focused). I’d say 85% of the scenarios mentioned are specifically addressed in the design and generalizable to a few mechanisms, while the remaining 15% are based on features that we need new IC features for(which have been asked for, in part, because of scenarios very similar to what is mentioned in this article…derivable canister principal IDs for “ID” and access to enclaves for compute over encrypted content.)
I’d be more than happy to walk through it with you. There are hundreds of stories I can tell you of where and how the proposal came about and what types of things it intends to address. You can also review the earlier crack at it from Origyn from which much additional learning made its way into the standards: https://2753736286-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FWUDE9boIsKoih8lkRfGQ%2Fuploads%2F2EcaW0EQe1O63hJxH9er%2FORIGYN_PerpetualOS_WhitePaper.pdf?alt=media&token=5dee91c7-5a0e-4e54-98d0-4cdba086e237