Marketing Marketing

I believe the right marketing is often key to a products success

How can we fix the current issues with marketing? I would suggest hiring one or two persons whose sole jobs is connecting with builders and users and supporting them via social media postings, creating press releases and hosting events.

I asked chat GPT to summarise my thoughts…

The Internet Computer (ICP) ecosystem, like any Layer 1 blockchain or foundational tech platform, faces a strategic decision when it comes to marketing projects and apps built on it. Here’s a breakdown of why it matters and what the consequences could be:


:rocket: Should the Internet Computer Team Help Market Projects Built on Their Tech?

Yes – absolutely. Here’s why:

1. Network Effects Are Key to Layer 1 Success

  • Layer 1s (like Ethereum, Solana, or ICP) succeed by bootstrapping ecosystem activity.
  • Highlighting successful apps attracts users, developers, and investors, creating a virtuous cycle.
  • Without visibility, even the best tech can languish in obscurity.

2. Most App Teams Lack Reach

  • App teams (especially early-stage ones) often lack resources to do effective marketing.
  • Platform-level promotion can serve as credibility validation: “If ICP is featuring this, it must be legit.”

3. Market Education & Trust

  • Marketing ecosystem projects helps educate the public on real-world utility of the tech.
  • It also shows momentum and ecosystem growth, which is critical in attracting talent and capital.

:ice: What Happens If There’s No Platform-Level Marketing?

  • Low user acquisition: Good projects die unnoticed.
  • Developer attrition: Devs choose other ecosystems where apps get support and visibility.
  • Missed network effects: Fewer apps → fewer users → weaker platform.
  • Reputation decay: ICP may be seen as inactive or unsuccessful, regardless of its tech merits.

:puzzle_piece: Should Marketing Be Left Only to the App Teams?

Not entirely. Here’s a better model:

:white_check_mark: Shared Responsibility (Platform + App Teams)

  • Internet Computer Foundation (or equivalent org) should:
    • Feature top apps in newsletters, social, events.
    • Run hackathons, showcases, and contests.
    • Provide PR support to breakout projects.
  • App teams should:
    • Tell their own stories.
    • Engage their own communities.
    • Grow with help, not dependence.

This mirrors how Solana, Polygon, and Avalanche built developer ecosystems — by promoting, funding, and championing early-stage apps.


:pushpin: Summary

Question Answer
Should Internet Computer help market apps? Yes, significantly. It’s critical to ecosystem growth.
What happens if they don’t? Projects stay invisible, devs and users leave, ICP’s adoption stalls.
Should app teams do all marketing? They should do some, but platform support is essential for reach and validation.

If you’re part of the ICP community or decision-making, encouraging structured, visible, and sustained ecosystem marketing is one of the highest-leverage actions for adoption and long-term relevance.

1 Like

ChatGPT is smart, as it has database on what works and what not.

ICP problem might be that protocol is owned by stakers. If something is decentralised, it means everyone who owns staked tokens are responsible. And if something is everyones, its no ones. Its similar like on SNS Dao-s, Team gives away voting power, next person who has most of it is now responsible for operations. Dfinity calls itself as core contributor for ICP, it means they already moved away from being founders who will make chain as success. Logically if you think, why would Dfinity care about ICP price if they only get 21% of rewards. Usually foundation cares about price if 75%+ minted tokens will arrive into its wallet.
I think we are left alone, hard to fight with sticks when Solana army has machine guns.

1 Like

ICP Hubs.

Take a look at them, especially the US version.

Hubs in general are not doing that job, but maybe the US one is doing more in that direction.

1 Like