I would personally like to see all the off topic comments moved to one of the threads focusing on liquid staking decentralisation. Good shout on trying to get things back on track @WebTreeSoftwareSolut. In the future you could trying reaching out to @aligatorr89 and @MalithHatananchchige for questions too, they’re very involved in voting on subnet management proposals, and are also members of CO.DELTA.
I think @fxgst’s post clarified the direct consequences of this proposal. Funds have been reserved by this proposal for renting the new subnet (which doesn’t exist yet).
The interesting bits will be the node onboarding proposals, particularly given the upheaval and proposed changes in that area.
Thanks @fxgst, am I right in expecting that at most only one node in the new subnet can be owned by the Swiss Subnet AG, who cannot be a UBO connected to any of the other nodes?
Is there any more detailed information anywhere about the strategy for encouraging more nodes to be onboarded by separate independent entities? Will new Node Providers need to be onboarded, or just new nodes from existing Node Providers?