Governance Centralization Risk from Liquid Staking Design

Right but, blackmail would be if Adam said: give me 10M WTN or else…

that’s not whats happenning there.

1 Like

The only solution to stop the attacks on the dao is to send Adam 10m tokens….

Idk how you don’t see that as extortion.

ummm let me break it down for you.

Blackmail is when someone demands something in exchange to prevent something bad from happening.

That is not what is occuring here.

That is an internal conversation within the dev team, to offer a compromise because they are worried and do not want competition. You are stretching at best here… at worst this is disengenuous.

1 Like

This was a message sent to the dev team. The dev team blocked the user who sent them this message

1 Like

ok, if thats true, but nothing you posted shows that.

As someone with zero skin in the game, for either party this doesn’t look honest.

i don’t know man, I think you’re stretching at best.

If the WTN dev team feels like they’re being blackmailed, they can say that themselves.

Also building a competing product is something that should be welcomed in free markets, and not seen as a “threat”

Everyone in the dao wants him to build one already.

Mico is being paid 15000 dollars to post in the forums so can’t believe anything he is saying he is being paid to say it…

Nice pay out mico good job :clap:

Now I’m really confused.

You guys started these discussions by saying Adam’s claims that WTN was not decentralized had no merit.

He then proved that 3 account holders effectively control all the VP.

You then said his conspiracy theory that they are working with coinbase had no merit.

Now you’re saying it’s better to work with coinbase.

You keep moving the goalposts.

I’m not making any claims about the intentions of those 3 holders, other than that they will probably vote in ways to increase or retain their profitability and influence. I’ve just noticed that everytime @borovan makes a claim, you guys call it a conspiracy, and then when it’s found to be substantiated you move the goalposts.

2 Likes

Wait. You’re getting paid by adam to do the very thing you’re accusing him of doing? :woozy_face::thinking:

2 Likes

Good spin on your parts

I’ve posted about wtn well before they gave this grant out.

No one knew this grant was even a thing and no one asked for it.

A little different than what you’re accusing me of though.

I’ve seen nothing he posted be proven. They openly say they won’t post evidence here

well the three account thing was proven with enzos tool…
this isn’t even an argument anymore.

The coinbase thing I guess is still speculation, it’s just funny that now @Henn91 is saying he wants WTN to work with coinbase, when this was Adam’s accusation the whole time.

1 Like

And who were the three accounts? Wasn’t bity one of those?

really irrelevant. 3 accounts determine the vote, if they are aligned. that’s all that really matters.

Bity is gold dao…..
(20 words here)

No? I get paid by adam for the work I do with Dragginz? :thinking:

What i say here, X, telegram and discord are my own thoughts which I don’t get paid for

Good job trying though :wink:

What kind of work do you do? Lol

1 Like