You guys started these discussions by saying Adam’s claims that WTN was not decentralized had no merit.
He then proved that 3 account holders effectively control all the VP.
You then said his conspiracy theory that they are working with coinbase had no merit.
Now you’re saying it’s better to work with coinbase.
You keep moving the goalposts.
I’m not making any claims about the intentions of those 3 holders, other than that they will probably vote in ways to increase or retain their profitability and influence. I’ve just noticed that everytime @borovan makes a claim, you guys call it a conspiracy, and then when it’s found to be substantiated you move the goalposts.
well the three account thing was proven with enzos tool…
this isn’t even an argument anymore.
The coinbase thing I guess is still speculation, it’s just funny that now @Henn91 is saying he wants WTN to work with coinbase, when this was Adam’s accusation the whole time.
Coding, artist, comedian, HR, snack checker (making sure we have a full inventory of snacks daily) wine checker have to make sure all the favourites are in stock alot of other things but you get the drift
Yes this makes sense considering Codegov its founder’s track record.
I support Adam too. Do you have something to say about me too @Mico ? Why is your off topic ad hominem derailments are not censored here by “moderators”?
I find it funny that you reverse the blame on to Adam and others instead of staying on the topic or addressing the issues they raised. Its in the forums. I hope you know how to read them.
Just like No one knew about the Governance Centralization Risk from WTN
Just like no one knew about Boom DAO and W-e-n-z-e-l-s motion proposals, network economic proposals, voting proposals etc
But somehow you lot are the first to rush and defend the rug artists being called out. Its ironic to me to see you project your pseudointellectual moralism while spamming the topics non stop.
Wasn’t it 5 accounts? Or 4 accounts if you believe that Adam has accurately linked 2 of the largest accounts as 1 person? Three accounts don’t add up to 51%. The Neuron’s Fund (blue) doesn’t vote.
Actually would be cool for WTN adoption to do proportional representation. There is no point taking the rest of us along with the ride if majority is already concentrated. As a financial product, it’s well thought of, but if you make everyone have a voice, I’m sure it will get us more on board(the setup now feels like a hostage situation)