Governance Centralization Risk from Liquid Staking Design

Now I’m really confused.

You guys started these discussions by saying Adam’s claims that WTN was not decentralized had no merit.

He then proved that 3 account holders effectively control all the VP.

You then said his conspiracy theory that they are working with coinbase had no merit.

Now you’re saying it’s better to work with coinbase.

You keep moving the goalposts.

I’m not making any claims about the intentions of those 3 holders, other than that they will probably vote in ways to increase or retain their profitability and influence. I’ve just noticed that everytime @borovan makes a claim, you guys call it a conspiracy, and then when it’s found to be substantiated you move the goalposts.

2 Likes

Wait. You’re getting paid by adam to do the very thing you’re accusing him of doing? :woozy_face::thinking:

2 Likes

Good spin on your parts

I’ve posted about wtn well before they gave this grant out.

No one knew this grant was even a thing and no one asked for it.

A little different than what you’re accusing me of though.

I’ve seen nothing he posted be proven. They openly say they won’t post evidence here

well the three account thing was proven with enzos tool…
this isn’t even an argument anymore.

The coinbase thing I guess is still speculation, it’s just funny that now @Henn91 is saying he wants WTN to work with coinbase, when this was Adam’s accusation the whole time.

1 Like

And who were the three accounts? Wasn’t bity one of those?

really irrelevant. 3 accounts determine the vote, if they are aligned. that’s all that really matters.

Bity is gold dao…..
(20 words here)

No? I get paid by adam for the work I do with Dragginz? :thinking:

What i say here, X, telegram and discord are my own thoughts which I don’t get paid for

Good job trying though :wink:

What kind of work do you do? Lol

1 Like

Coding, artist, comedian, HR, snack checker (making sure we have a full inventory of snacks daily) wine checker have to make sure all the favourites are in stock alot of other things but you get the drift

1 Like

Do you have a github profile I can check out?

But I think I get the grift :wink:

Hey I’d like to steer this discussion back towards
the topic. Im curious if others of you share @Henn91 opinion here.

Because I am not of the opinion that coinbase has any incentive to “pump ICP up”

Curious to hear where others who have been battling adam in this thread fall on this topic.

Yes this makes sense considering Codegov its founder’s track record.

I support Adam too. Do you have something to say about me too @Mico ? Why is your off topic ad hominem derailments are not censored here by “moderators”?

I find it funny that you reverse the blame on to Adam and others instead of staying on the topic or addressing the issues they raised. Its in the forums. I hope you know how to read them.

2 Likes

Just like No one knew about the Governance Centralization Risk from WTN

Just like no one knew about Boom DAO and W-e-n-z-e-l-s motion proposals, network economic proposals, voting proposals etc

But somehow you lot are the first to rush and defend the rug artists being called out. Its ironic to me to see you project your pseudointellectual moralism while spamming the topics non stop.

6 Likes

Wasn’t it 5 accounts? Or 4 accounts if you believe that Adam has accurately linked 2 of the largest accounts as 1 person? Three accounts don’t add up to 51%. The Neuron’s Fund (blue) doesn’t vote.

This whole thread is a waste of time at this point.

1 Like

I find this thread to be very productive iff we tune out the noises from the people that do not want this discussion to continue or flourish

1 Like

Yes you can find it If you look hard enough :slight_smile:
I work very hard!

2 Likes

Jordan I do not understand why these people are asking what work you do when you’re not working for them or have to answer them.

I think they are angry at you because they have already exhausted their jabs and irrelevant remarks to cover up their tracks..

2 Likes

Actually would be cool for WTN adoption to do proportional representation. There is no point taking the rest of us along with the ride if majority is already concentrated. As a financial product, it’s well thought of, but if you make everyone have a voice, I’m sure it will get us more on board(the setup now feels like a hostage situation)

3 Likes