[FEATURE REQ] MUT+MRT - AEON; DeFi Infrastructure Layer for ICP Ecosystem

Was not able to post the links to the white/technical papers, would love to share upon request - just ask!

I’ve been (solely) building AEON (Adaptive Economic Optimization Network) it’s not another DEX, it’s infrastructure that new and existing DEXs can integrate to offer zero-fee trading, ML-optimized execution, and cross-chain liquidity.

Why this matters: Instead of competing with ICPSwap/Sonic, AEON becomes the backend they integrate. You keep your UI/brand/users - we provide the computational sovereignty layer.

Only possible on ICP due to: unbounded computation (ML), HTTPS outcalls (no oracles), reverse gas (zero user fees), chain fusion (native cross-chain).

Looking for: Integration partners, technical feedback, early contributors, or a high-five will suffice as well.


The Problem

Every DeFi protocol rebuilds the same infrastructure:

  • Each DEX bootstraps liquidity from scratch
  • Users pay $10-50 in gas fees
  • Every project needs oracle subscriptions
  • Liquidity is fragmented across protocols

This is like every website running its own data center instead of using AWS.


AEON’s Solution: Infrastructure-as-a-Service

Traditional: Protocol → Build Everything → Launch → Pray for users

With AEON: Protocol → Integrate SDK → Instant Infrastructure

Example integration (ICPSwap could do this in ~2 weeks):

import { AeonRouter } from '@aeon/protocol-sdk';

async function swap(from, to, amount) {
  return await AeonRouter.getOptimalRoute({
    fromToken: from,
    toToken: to, 
    amount: amount,
    useMLOptimization: true,  // Better than static curves
    gasless: true              // Zero fees for end user!
  });
}

What the integrating protocol gets:

  • Zero-fee trading (massive UX improvement)
  • Better execution (ML > static AMM curves)
  • Cross-chain access (BTC/ETH via chain fusion)
  • MEV protection (capture + redistribute to users)
  • Keep 100% of your branding/UI/users

Why Only ICP Can Do This

Feature ICP Ethereum
Running AEON $80K/year $50M/year
ML inference 20B instructions/msg ~30M max ($900 gas)
Oracles Native HTTPS outcalls Chainlink ($50K+/year)
User fees $0 (reverse gas) $10-50 per trade
Cross-chain Native (chain fusion) Bridges (hack risk)

625x cost advantage = entirely different economics possible.


The Tech: Dual-Token Cybernetic System

This isn’t a typical utility/reflection token - this is control theory applied to decentralized economics.

MUT (MASS Utility) = Computational Fuel

  • Protocol pays gas (not users!)
  • Stakers generate cycle budget: Cₜ = Mₛₜₐₖₑ · rₜ · Uₜ
  • PID controller adapts and adjusts supply based on network load, and current market data.

MRT (MASS Reflection) = Entropy Regulator

  • Redistributes MEV profits (not just fees)
  • Volatility-damping via dynamic coefficients
  • Stabilizes the system during chaos

Coupled Dynamics:

ẋ = Ax + Bu  (state-space model)

MUT → Energy input (computation)
↓
MRT → Entropy sink (stabilization)  
↓
PID feedback loop adjusts supply
↓
Lyapunov-proven stability: V(x) = xᵀPx, V̇ < 0

Translation: With mathematical proofs this won’t death-spiral like algorithmic stablecoins.


5-Layer Architecture (Quick-Version)

Layer 0: Data mesh (HTTPS outcalls) + on-chain ML
Layer 1: PID-controlled burn/mint + zk-proofs
Layer 2: MUT/MRT/XNT token dynamics
Layer 3: ML-optimized AMM + MEV capture
Layer 4: Governance (ICP Neurons + Internet Identity)
Layer 5: Cross-chain network (federated ML, zkML, quantum security)


Who Should Integrate?

DEXs (ICPSwap, Sonic, InfinitySwap):

  • Integration time: 2-4 weeks
  • You get: Zero-fee trading as competitive advantage
  • You keep: All your users, UI, branding

New token projects:

  • Integration time: 1-2 weeks
  • You get: Instant liquidity across ICP, no bootstrap needed
  • You avoid: 6 months building DEX infrastructure

Lending/yield protocols:

  • Integration time: 3-6 weeks
  • You get: ML-optimized rates for users
  • Benefit: Stay competitive without building own ML

Infrastructure projects:

  • Bridges, oracles, analytics, identity
  • Integration: Connect to specific AEON layers
  • Benefit: Composable primitives you don’t have to rebuild

Open Technical Questions (need some input!)

1. ML compute limits:

  • Target: 50M parameters, <2s inference
  • Question: Anyone pushed canisters this hard? Optimization tips?

2. HTTPS outcall redundancy:

  • Current: Query 5 exchanges, use Median Absolute Deviation
  • Question: Best practices for multi-source consensus on ICP?

3. Cycle cost sustainability:

  • Math: $80K/year cycles vs $84M revenue at modest volume
  • Question: Hidden costs I’m missing? What if cycle prices 10x?

4. SDK revenue model:

  • Option A: 0.01% volume take rate
  • Option B: $500/month subscription
  • Option C: 20% of execution improvement
  • Question: What would make YOU integrate?

5. zkML overhead:

  • Trade-off: Security vs speed
  • Question: Verify all inferences (slow) or sample 10% randomly?

Roadmap

Q4 2025: Public testnet + SDK v0.1 + docs
Q4 2025 - Q1 2026: Mainnet beta + first integration + security audit
Q3-Q4 2026: Full launch + 5+ integrations + cross-chain live

Target metrics:

  • Year 1: $50M TVL, 10 integrated protocols
  • Year 2: $200M+ TVL, ecosystem standard

How to Get Involved

Protocol developers: Let’s talk integration (2-week pilot program)
Engineers: Contribute Rust/Motoko/ML work (token allocation)
Researchers: Collaborate on papers (control theory + token engineering)
Early users: Join testnet; Q4/2025-Q1/2026 (early allocations)
Best friend: We could do the same thing we do everyday, Pinky. Try to take over the World!
Investors/Early-Adopters: Reach out I guess? /shrug

Links:

  • Whitepaper: Zenodo, “Mass-Utility & Mass-Reflection Tokens: Foundations of the Adaptive Economic Optimization Network”
  • MUT/MRT Technical: On Zenodo, “The Dual-Token Cybernetic Economy: Formal Modeling of Mass Utility and Mass Reflection Tokens”
  • Twitter: [@Xentinet]

Why This Matters for ICP

Current state: ICP DeFi liquidity is fragmented ($X on ICPSwap, $Y on Sonic, etc.)

With AEON: All protocols integrate same backend → unified liquidity → better UX for everyone

This proves ICP’s thesis: Computational sovereignty enables what’s impossible elsewhere.

Not “just another DEX” - this is how we scale ICP DeFi properly.


Building in public. Early stage, lots to figure out, need community input.

Hit me with questions/feedback/criticisms below.

Tags: #defi #infrastructure sdk #ml #integration


P.S. If you’re from ICPSwap, Sonic, or any ICP DeFi project - seriously, let’s talk. This could be huge for your users.

1 Like

:hand_with_fingers_splayed: Good luck… sounds like a decent value prop.

1 Like

Reverse gas model to reverse aggregation. Instead of aggregator integrate with DEX, dex integrate with aggregator. :rofl:.

1 Like

Appreciate the input, but AEON’s architecture isn’t a word-flip. It actually reverses where execution and economics live, not just the phrasing.
Reverse-gas = users don’t fund execution; the protocol nets it.
Reverse-aggregation = DEXs register into AEON, and AEON becomes the meta-execution layer instead of a UI wrapper pulling liquidity.