Enhancing Network Decentralization - Proposals for Identity Verification and Subnet Allocation

[Lorimer]

@Lorimer

What makes the number 25 magical in this respect? Why would 24.9% make someone no longer a UBO? How many 24.9% non-UBO shares should a node provider be allowed to have in other node providers’ affairs (2, 3, 4 ..)? How many arbitrary numbers and levels of indirection need introducing to shoehorn the reality of interdependence into a token gesture of independence?

Is anyone able to offer some clarity on these technicalities?

If a single node provider has a 24.9% share in all of the other node providers on the network, would that be okay (for argument’s stake)? If not, what about that would make it not okay?