Dear ICP Community,
TLDR: DFINITY Foundation will vote NO on a proposal:
Background
The DFINITY Foundation (via its named neuron 27) has started to vote on governance proposals. Since the DFINITY Foundation is a critical player in the ecosystem, our long-term intent is to make a habit of explaining our rationale for how we vote in motion proposals, Foundation voting power, etc… for further visibility.
Proposal in question
In this particular case, we will vote NO on the Proposal:
We want to be clear in what this means and does not mean:
- Foundation’s default voting for voting is to REJECT any proposal it does not fully understand and agree with. The foundation is rejecting because it believes motion proposals are supposed to:
- Inspire direction or conversations to bring the IC forward
- be actionable (they have a goal)
In this particular case, the foundation found the objective of proposal #52579 (as quoted on the proposal):
Increase the daily return of neurons participating in motion proposals
is not the intent of the motion proposals.
- Foundation may yet vote YES on future proposals from this neuron if proposals inspire direction or conversations to bring the IC forward or have an action.