-
ICP Forum:
- Total Supply: 400,000,000,000 $MINE tokens
- Treasury Allocation: 30% (Subject to DAO voting)
- Decentralized Sale Allocation: 35% (Including Neuron Fund)
- Development Team: 15% (12-month neuron)
- Early Contributors: 10% (Initial infrastructure funding, 12-month neuron)
- Liquidity Allocation: 10%
-
GitBook Documentation Before Your Presales:
- Total Supply: Not mentioned
- 25% Presale (Strategic and private equity rounds)
- 25% Public Sale
- 10% Strategic Round Private Equity
- 10% Marketing
- 7% Partnership & Community
- 5% Team
- 5% Advisors
- 10% Liquidity
- 3% Airdrop Campaign
lol, you just deleted my message and banned me from the telegram
Well, as the evidence clearly shows, @MinePro is a scam.
Please do us all a favor and kindly take your scamming talents to a different ecosystem!
Can you please answer this question? Complete Overview of MinePro - #7 by JaMarco
The extra 3 zeros is an obvious typo. Go look into the white paper and you can see it’s always been 400 million.
The tokenomics were not revealed on the EVM side because there’s way more factors to take into consideration then the SNS side.
- Airdrop considerations (none on the SNS side)
- Raise amount. (There are VC’s and angels on the EVM side that greatly effect valuation.)
The team is more than willing to hop on a video call with anyone from this forum who wants to directly address any of this fud. I feel like we have a right to address any accusations directly. Just let us know.
Thanks
Theres no one Dutch on either team. Logic Mining is a Wyoming LLC. We’re not going go back forth addressing hear say, conjecture, and baseless fud from the same 2 people who motives are unclear. Again, if you feel that strongly you can hop on a call with us anytime.
Thanks.
Try again on another Chain, create another website, and psyop another Community
You aint touching that Neuron Fund, baby boy, lol
Loka Mining will support MinePro through its decentralized mining pools. We need our own staking dapp since its rewarded through staking our token, with its own vesting structure. The $MINE staking pools will be facilitated directly through ckBTC via Loka Minings pools. We’ll have absolutely no custody of the BTC rewards.
Hope that helps.
ANYWAYS, THAT WILL BE ALL FROM ME IN THIS FORUM TOPIC
IVE DROPPED ENOUGH PROOF OF THIS SCANDAL IN THIS FORUM TOPIC
SCANDAL SUMMARY: https://kv2oj-miaaa-aaaaj-azseq-cai.icp0.io/
IF THEY STILL GET ANY TRACTION AFTER THIS, THEN WE AS A COMMUNITY CANT BE HELPED
I still dont understand why you need your own token and vesting structure. Why not just use Loka’s token and staking system? What are the advantages of your staking system over Loka’s?
Firstly, we’re actually NOT in Calgary. We’re a few hours north of Edmonton (Again, poorly researched, see screenshot.) Second, you do realize Alberta as a providence is one of the largest and most active mining hubs in the world right now? There’s thousands of flare gas operations. Go look up what the dollar per gigajoule average is, do the conversion, and you’ll see there are many operations in that price range (sometimes even cheaper.)
I don’t see any proof. I see someone on a completely unhinged tirade of fud and misinformation. We’ve already tried to answer your questions and go above and beyond to address any concerns. However, you remain belligerent so we’re done here. 99% of the posts from your relatively new account are attacking us? Seems coordinated.
Thanks
We have to provide hashrate, it’s not just there. Rewards aren’t possible without equipment, so how would the DAO purchase and own equipment to produce rewards?
Loka Mining is facilitating hash rate through established operations. Like ours. They won’t just give us equipment to hash, nor would they issue us tokens with no ownership in their protocol. They’d also need somewhere to mine (which I’m not sure they have yet.) Hopefully, that’s where we come in and grow the partnership through our energy and available site land.
If the ICP raised is used to purchase the equipment and there’s no token, then what from there? How does the project scale? How does volume and price appreciation happen?
Now, In theory, you could just keep everything static and distribute rewards based on total ICP contributed during the SNS. However it would be fixed. The whole idea is bring adoption and volume to this ecosystem, along with BTC liquidity. You’d essentially lose a potential revenue stream in the token appreciation.
Hope this helps.
Looks very fishy, no ty.
So this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=588e3OQ5CNc) is the only proof you guys have? A young dude inside a car in the middle of nowhere saying he can’t show the miners because… reasons?
This is normal, they FUD every project on the SNS. It’s pretty bad, they said they are happy to talk to them and these fudders won’t talk and delete posts which looks like an organized fud campaign we have seen before on ICP projects. This this system is broken you should own at least 300 to 500 ICP to even post here IMO. I have seen much worse attacks, so bad that Dfinity put out a statement, look it up - [community-statement-on-constructive-dialogue/33138]