Dear Working Group!
In the recent WG meeting we have discussed a change of semantics of ICRC-2 approvals to be closer to ERC-20. Please have a look at the PR-109 and comment if you have inputs to this!
Thanks and have a nice weekend!
Dear Working Group!
In the recent WG meeting we have discussed a change of semantics of ICRC-2 approvals to be closer to ERC-20. Please have a look at the PR-109 and comment if you have inputs to this!
Thanks and have a nice weekend!
Dear working group members!
Here is the proposed agenda and draft slides for the ledger and tokenization WG meeting on Tuesday, May 2, 2023. See the working group calendars (Google Calendar, calendar browser link) for details and dial-in information.
Agenda
The goal is to find an agreement in this meeting and finish the ICRC-2 topic off to move forward to new topics.
Please have a look at PR-109 before tomorrow’s meeting
See you tomorrow!
The slides, recording, and minutes of the WG Meeting of April 18 are available:
Slides
Recording
Minutes
I am curious what is a use case that requires the expected_allowance
field? Can someone provide an example?
Dear WG members!
As discussed in the recent meeting, we want to move forward with a WG vote on the ICRC-2 and the ERC-20 semantics for approvals. Please cast your vote in its GitHub issue.
Just tagging the members I know the forum ids of:
@skilesare, @levifeldman, @Maxfinity, @lastmjs, @simpson, @timo, @benji, @roman-kashitsyn, @mariop
Dear working group members!
Here is the proposed agenda and draft slides for the ledger and tokenization WG meeting on Tuesday, May 16, 2023. See the working group calendars (Google Calendar, calendar browser link) for details and dial-in information.
Agenda
Slides
Relevant minutes:
See you tomorrow!
It allows the caller to change the allowance conditionally using compare-and-swap. We think it’s good to have the option to set it because the allowance may change in between it’s displayed to the user and the user tries to change it.
Any information when ICRC-2 will go for NNS vote?
We are preparing the proposal right now.
Dear working group members,
As discussed during the wg, I’ve opened a new forum thread about ICRC-3 with a proposal as starting point.
Was it publishing yet? I might have missed it
The slides, recording, and minutes of the WG Meeting of May 02 are available:
Slides
Recording
Minutes
The slides, recording, and minutes of the WG Meeting of May 16 are available:
Slides
Recording
Minutes
Dear working group members!
Here is the proposed agenda and draft slides for the ledger and tokenization WG meeting on Tuesday, May 30, 2023. See the working group calendars (Google Calendar , calendar browser link ) for details and dial-in information.
Agenda
Specifically, we want to
Slides
Relevant minutes:
See you tomorrow!
Hi DeFi projects!
We are planning to discuss the proposal made by @mariop on ICRC-3 in the upcoming WG meeting tomorrow May 30.
Please have a look at it and contribute your thoughts in the forum topic. Of course, you are also welcome to join the WG meeting, see the meeting calendar in the post just above.
@simpson, @ccyanxyz, @brutoshi, @Maxfinity, …
Hi everyone,
The motion proposal 122613 for the ICRC-2 Fungible Token Standard is live and being voted right now!
Keep in mind that the summary is missing the API part because of an escaping mistake. We should proceed with voting as what is missing is just a copy of what is available in the standard repository.
Thanks to everyone involved with the new standard.