In the future, the use of NNS will spread widely. Have you thought about blocking advertisements by submitting a proposal at a cheap price and getting a lot of views?
1 Like
or even worse - scam proposals.
in the cosmos governance scammers are accepting the loss of their proposal deposit after being rejected by a - no with veto - vote, just for 2 weeks of free trapping potential time, where wallet logged in users might hit a scamming link.
1 Like
This isn’t an easy fix. Not just for ICP but all blockchain governance. The balance is between being ‘open to all’ and being closed to spammers. You could make each proposal cost 100 ICP but this then makes it governance for the rich only.
Maybe there should be a locked amount which is held by the NNS until the proposal is either accepted or rejected. If during this time the proposal is voted as spam X number of times (needs a way to flag/ vote on this) the locked ICP is burned or sent to the community fund.
This way there is a two tier cost for proposals. A low cost for non-spam and a high cost for spam.
1 Like