@victorshoup
Yes, in my area my tax consultant/ CPA suggested that (as of right now after the maturity modulation update occurred) I do not have to report any maturity that I continuously merge and add to my stake. This is because of the maturity modulation update. i.e. newly minted ICP tokens are not actually created, dispersed, or minted until the time of full dissolve, OR I spawn them into liquid ICP. IF I choose to spawn them into newly minted ICP (for whatever reason, to sell use etc. etc) it then becomes a taxable event, where I report $0 cost basis and if I sell them, I use the price I sold it as for a cost basis.
According to my consultant anytime you receive any tokens as rewards, maturity etc. etc. this is a taxable event where you received x ICP for 0$. Yes, this must be reported as such or as capital gains.
However, if I choose to automatically stake maturity and never spawn it into newly minted liquid ICP , and then fully dissolve and disburse I will then use the maturity given as though I paid $0 for x amount and paid x amount for my initial investment.
This would be because A. newly minted ICPs are not given until the time the neuron fully dissolves (again assuming in this scenario I only auto stake maturity). Essentially they “do not exist” yet (unless again, I spawn and sell). That maturity is only symbolic of what ICP I could or will have at the time the neuron fully dissolves.
*Then/ you can also you use the maturity modulation on the dashboard to assume how much ICP per 100 ICP spawned.
Something that should be disclosed about my personal situation or the way I “do things”. I vote “no” on anything and all things relating to SNS projects including but not limited to ICP-ckBTC pairs as well as any decentralization sales. In my area, these are still highly speculative and could face the full wrath of the SEC. Thus, I assume (as a precaution) this will eventually occur and will have the ability to demonstrate I voted “no” to anything that may seem like unregulated security. As hopeful as I am for the future I believe that is the real risk users in my area or highly tax-regulated states.
Using $0 for the cost basis for my maturity or “voting rewards” in my opinion is far less risky than trying to assume a moving average, writing down explicitly what they cost, and how many you received during x, y, z. It just would be tedious tasks to spawn say every week, and then save and log as you go. I can understand why some might choose that method, however, I plan on auto-staking my initial investment/8 year neuron for the long haul… In full disclosure, this process may actually make your “taxes” through the roof the year you dissolve fully and have to report the maturity. However, my plan would be to sell over a span of time as a boost to income during my glory years. In this case, I could reasonably dissolve a neuron(s) and then slowly sell off which may create less of an impact after the newly minted ICP reported at $0 has been minted and held for over a year.
As for other resources, I think this may depend on your country. I have some resources for the USA that might be limited in scope. They are mainly just sites with information on taxable events, SEC regulations, rules, and guidelines.
One final note/ disclosure. It is said in several codes of ethics, that those with an investment worth more than x amount (generally anything on or above $5000 USD) should refrain from speaking on anything that may be seen as unethical due to the nature of their investment to prevent biases. With this in mind, I (again) disclose that I fall under this category.
Therfore, I will and should refrain from speaking on any other topics outside of this. I.e. anything to do with how the network should be managed or projects ethical obligations. This is (again) why I reserve the right to throw up numerous “no” votes and have distanced myself (as I learn/ earn my software engineering degree).
Finally, as for other coins/ tokens with a similar “taste” as this. I have been searching and despite my objections or concerns with the community or the ICP blockchain itself, I will admit there is not much like it in terms of accessible staking, and producing products (even with the limitations they have). I only have a stake (long term un-dissolving auto-staking, 8-year-neuron) in the ICP blockchain. This is for many reasons. The foremost is personal safety concerns, not being educated enough (yet), nor finding a blockchain, crypto, token, coin, that is well… As advanced with as accessible UI as the IC.
I appreciate the time to respond and look forward to further conversation. My only intent is to distribute information to others that may be where I was when I first entered the community. Without impacting anything (beyond what’s at hand) with my own implied biases. I always accept feedback, challenge my opinions, and have civil discourse/ debate. Taxes/ tax time is stressful. If this approach help(ed) anyone’s nerves it was worth the time.
should any other approaches work in highly regulated states, I would love to discuss and hear explicitly what your consultants mention. Therefore I can carry said information to my own advisor and see if it’s applicable to my area.
Thanks again for the time and patience.
OH! final note. I was also advised that anything “swap” related is a taxable event as well. So for example, ICP-ckBTC swaps. In my area that’s a taxable event that is almost or nearly impossible to continuously track if you do so fruitfully without care or precise notes. Therfore, I will not be using any “swapping” features. Using DEX’s in my area is another thing I have yet to discuss with my consultant. So, I have nothin to add.