Upcoming Nuance SNS swap

hey @justmythoughts - indeed these are important metrics.

Our own analytics we capture:

  • article views (each article)
  • total article views for a writer
  • total article views (158048)
  • registered users (3356)
  • article applause (each article)
  • total applause for a writer
  • total applause (64748)
  • total articles published (3603)

All of the above :point_up_2: is publicly available via the block explorer.

With usergeek we capture:

  • Active users (DAO/WAU/MAU)
  • New users
  • Retention

We do not use other product analytics suites because they are not on chain. We are 100% on-chain. Because you’re not hardcore unless you live hardcore :muscle:

1 Like

Analysing the other SNS swaps to date - they all had well over 100 participants contributing more than 10 ICP.

Nonetheless, we have reduced it to 50 just to be on the safe side.

1 Like

Also, for those interested. We have our wiki here for self-service user guides Welcome to Nuance - Nuance Wiki

1 Like

Hi Nuance team & all,
Please check out the SNS Init Analyzer, which you can use to review the Nuance SNS init file.

2 Likes

Using the SNS Analyzer, this is the result I got for Nuance Swap:

Looks like the devs will have decisive majority after the swap

1 Like

@vavram I tried it with the most recent sns init from Nuance (using the link posted at the beginning of this thread), and I obtained a different outcome (Voting power of dev= 47.1%) Could you double check which file you used ?

2 Likes

Right, looks like it was an old version. Here’s the current one:

Regarding this @bjoernek, how can we check in the NNS proposal which version of the configuration will actually be deployed?

2 Likes

Hey @vavram, when we make our proposal you will be able to verify by inspecting the payload. Here is an example of how it will look: Proposal: 124483 - ICP Dashboard

2 Likes

For the time being, as explained by @Mitch, you can compare the payload.
With the next version of the SNS Tokenomics Analyzer, this comparison will be automated by the tool.

4 Likes

Nuance Looks like a cool project to me: They have a working product and good team.

Only have one concern behind: It seems that the team is having 47% voting power with assumed 100% participation of CF& non CF, it will surpasses 60% with assumed 50% participation of CF & non CF

@bjoernek Could you please comment on this.

Hope team will take a look into this @nicko .

Anyway all the best guys.

2 Likes

Overall Nuance is a good product. It should consider using ICRC NFT standard and need to get better UI for the dapp.

1 Like

Thanks @ivan_uncensored for the suggestion and feedback. We use one of the best design agencies in the Netherlands and without any bias whatsoever :stuck_out_tongue: I think our UI is beautiful. Our design philosophy is obviously minimal, but also we want the user to not know/realise they are on web3. Can you be more specific about “better UI”? Perhaps you would be willing to have a call to discuss more deeply?

2 Likes

It’s just how it shakes out. No different to how it started with DFINITY. The important part is getting control in the hands of writers.

2 Likes

Cross posting this Due Diligence as I believe it has relevance to this conversation:

4 Likes