Upcoming Nuance SNS swap

Governance
62

Of course, this is up to the community! One of our goals, which we hope the community supports, is to provide an unbelievably good user experience for the writing experience. So this suggestion is very much aligned and if the community supports it can be added to the backlog.

2 Likes
63

hey @justmythoughts - indeed these are important metrics.

Our own analytics we capture:

  • article views (each article)
  • total article views for a writer
  • total article views (158048)
  • registered users (3356)
  • article applause (each article)
  • total applause for a writer
  • total applause (64748)
  • total articles published (3603)

All of the above :point_up_2: is publicly available via the block explorer.

With usergeek we capture:

  • Active users (DAO/WAU/MAU)
  • New users
  • Retention

We do not use other product analytics suites because they are not on chain. We are 100% on-chain. Because you’re not hardcore unless you live hardcore :muscle:

1 Like
64

Analysing the other SNS swaps to date - they all had well over 100 participants contributing more than 10 ICP.

Nonetheless, we have reduced it to 50 just to be on the safe side.

1 Like
65

Also, for those interested. We have our wiki here for self-service user guides Welcome to Nuance - Nuance Wiki

1 Like
66

Hi Nuance team & all,
Please check out the SNS Init Analyzer, which you can use to review the Nuance SNS init file.

2 Likes
67

Using the SNS Analyzer, this is the result I got for Nuance Swap:

image
image3573×1760 258 KB

Looks like the devs will have decisive majority after the swap

1 Like
68

@vavram I tried it with the most recent sns init from Nuance (using the link posted at the beginning of this thread), and I obtained a different outcome (Voting power of dev= 47.1%) Could you double check which file you used ?

2 Likes
69

Right, looks like it was an old version. Here’s the current one:

image
image3561×1771 279 KB

Regarding this @bjoernek, how can we check in the NNS proposal which version of the configuration will actually be deployed?

2 Likes
70

Hey @vavram, when we make our proposal you will be able to verify by inspecting the payload. Here is an example of how it will look: Proposal: 124483 - ICP Dashboard

2 Likes
71

For the time being, as explained by @Mitch, you can compare the payload.
With the next version of the SNS Tokenomics Analyzer, this comparison will be automated by the tool.

4 Likes
72

Nuance Looks like a cool project to me: They have a working product and good team.

Only have one concern behind: It seems that the team is having 47% voting power with assumed 100% participation of CF& non CF, it will surpasses 60% with assumed 50% participation of CF & non CF

@bjoernek Could you please comment on this.

Hope team will take a look into this @nicko .

Anyway all the best guys.

2 Likes
73

Overall Nuance is a good product. It should consider using ICRC NFT standard and need to get better UI for the dapp.

1 Like
74

Thanks @ivan_uncensored for the suggestion and feedback. We use one of the best design agencies in the Netherlands and without any bias whatsoever :stuck_out_tongue: I think our UI is beautiful. Our design philosophy is obviously minimal, but also we want the user to not know/realise they are on web3. Can you be more specific about “better UI”? Perhaps you would be willing to have a call to discuss more deeply?

2 Likes
75

It’s just how it shakes out. No different to how it started with DFINITY. The important part is getting control in the hands of writers.

2 Likes
76

Cross posting this Due Diligence as I believe it has relevance to this conversation:

4 Likes