Hi @Laurie, thanks for your answers.
I think the fact that the dev team can easily take control of this DAO simply by increasing their dissolve delay straight after the short vesting period defies what a decentralisation sale is supposed to be about. Investors are supposed to have assurance that their funds are protected by the framework (assuming appropriate decentralisation).
I’ll vote to reject on these terms, but I’d certainly reconsider a future proposal if the VP issue is sorted out.