As once again, we are debating Tokenomics,
as an 8 year Neuron holder who has made some investment decisions over the past year, the frequent revisiting is tiring as well as could impact the return calculations, could it even force me out of my investment?
Now imagine a pension fund or professional investment fund, that would be intrigued to invest into ICP, to stake neurons, generate returns for its fund holders, only to see, at any given time, someone can come around and once again make a proposal and threaten the current tokenomics.
We have to limit the proposals or else, we will never secure the big players in the long run.
Thus:
- Tokenomics should of course be open to discussion
- Tokenomics should have the option to be changed by the DAO
- this should only be allowed at long timer intervals
I propose, Tokenomics, which specifically impact
a) Neuon payouts
b) server node payouts
c) burning mechanisms
to be only allowed once every 4 years.
We can time it with the bitcoin halving and US presidential election period, to have all the impactful events within the same year, giving investors a little more rest during the 3 years in between.
Let the Dominic proposal play out and be voted upon, and then integrate a 4 year lock until a next proposal can be made.