Technical Working Group: Node Providers

[Lorimer]

As addition input, please consider the following points…

@Lorimer

Why are some node providers feeling the need to obscure the terms of their node transfers

@Lorimer

While there’s still uncertainty about what these non-disclosure (and/or no comment) cases are about, I would suggest that the donor NPs and recipient NPs should be considered to belong to ‘clusters’ (and should not reside within the same subnet).

Most importantly…

@Lorimer

If this is done, it largely undoes the point of the transfers (which was to make the IC Target Topology easier to achieve more consistently - not harder…). What we actually need is clarity about these transfers, and if we can’t get that then I think this is the option that’s left

I’m planning to start work early tomorrow, and clock off early so that I can attend this 15:00 UTC meeting (that’s the plan at least )