Proposals 135664, 135665 & 135666 – LaCosta | CodeGov
Vote: REJECT
There has been no evidence for colluding nodes other than speculation. I don’t think decentralization should be ruled by conspiracy and as I stated in a previous review
I think this has been proved correct. Even with clarifications from NPs such as pictures, videos and bills, there are some people in the community that don’t seem satisfied and I doubt they will ever be.
I think the best solution lies in third party audits done by a company voted by the community. This will be periodical and will stop this marketing campaigns targeted against NPs based only on speculation and username choices.
About CodeGov
CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.
Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.