Subnet Management - tdb26 (NNS)

Proposal 134983 Review | LORIMER Known Neuron

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Relevant decentralisation stats are unchanged (those that form part of the IC Target Topology) and there is a clear public declaration for the cordoned nodes which is referred to in the proposal summary. 2 cordoned node replaced with 2 unassigned nodes. One of the swaps is for a node at the same data center and node provider.

Country Discrepancies (2)
Node Data Center Claimed Country According to api.ip2location.io According to ip-api.com According to domain WHOIS lookup
isegs Seoul 3 Korea (the Republic of) Belgium China China
mae7q South Moravian Region 1 Czechia Austria Czechia Czechia

See here for a related question.

Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

Smallest Distance Average Distance Largest Distance
EXISTING 0 km 7194.434 km 19461.421 km
PROPOSED 0 km 7233.114 km (+0.5%) 19461.421 km

This proposal slightly increases decentralisation, considered purely in terms of geographic distance (and therefore there’s a slight theoretical increase in localised disaster resilience). :+1:

Subnet characteristic counts →

Continents Countries Data Centers Owners Node Providers Node Operator
EXISTING 6 28 39 37 37 40
PROPOSED 6 28 39 37 37 40

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
EXISTING 18 3 2 2 3 1
PROPOSED 18 3 2 2 3 1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 132136

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description
  • Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)

  • Green marker represents an added node

  • Blue marker represents an unchanged node

  • Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

  • Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

  • Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to api.ip2location.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.

Node Changes
Action Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
Remove dndht UP :bar_chart: Europe Switzerland Geneva (ge1) HighDC Archery Blockchain SCSp yngfj
Remove tm3pc UP :bar_chart: Europe Slovenia Maribor (mb1) Posita.si Fractal Labs AG 3xiew
Add lh2af UNASSIGNED :bar_chart: Europe Portugal Lisbon 2 (li2) Edgoo Networks Bitmoon nvocp
Add zatyv UNASSIGNED :bar_chart: Europe Slovenia Maribor (mb1) Posita.si Fractal Labs AG 3xiew
Other Nodes
Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
yahq2 UP :bar_chart: South America Argentina CABA 1 (ar1) SyT - Servicios y Telecomunicaciones S.A. Mariano Stoll 5p6xp
u4zo2 UP :bar_chart: Oceania Australia Queensland 1 (sc1) NEXTDC Karel Frank f3toa
swzzz UP :bar_chart: Europe Belgium Brussels (br1) Digital Realty Allusion mjeqs
anudy UP :bar_chart: North America Canada Quebec l1 (mtl1) Leaseweb Marvelous Web3 ueggl
jmuoq UP :bar_chart: North America Canada Vancouver (bc1) Cyxtera Blockchain Development Labs feb2q
6hkcx UP :bar_chart: Europe Switzerland Zurich 2 (zh2) Everyware DFINITY Stiftung wqyl3
tg4ec UP :bar_chart: Europe Switzerland Zurich 2 (zh2) Everyware DFINITY Stiftung s7dud
ltzjy UP :bar_chart: North America Costa Rica San José 1 (cr1) Navegalo GeoNodes LLC eqv2i
mjte3 UP :bar_chart: Europe Czechia Praha 1 (pa1) MasterDC Ivanov Oleksandr 6jyzv
mae7q UP :bar_chart: Europe Czechia South Moravian Region 1 (bn1) Master Internet Lukas Helebrandt zc635
dbpb7 UP :bar_chart: Europe Germany Frankfurt 2 (fr2) Equinix Virtual Hive Ltd 3nu7r
67m4d UP :bar_chart: Europe Estonia Tallinn 1 (ta1) InfonetDC Bohatyrov Volodymyr 2fth2
tgbmf UP :bar_chart: Europe France Paris 1 (pr1) Celeste Carbon Twelve g3nqx
txh2c UP :bar_chart: Asia Georgia Tbilisi 1 (tb1) Cloud9 George Bassadone yhfy4
rcxhc UP :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 3 (hk3) hkcolo Power Meta Corporation 4lbqo
5iihd UP :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 4 (hk4) hkntt Origin Game aaxec
gvm7l UP :bar_chart: Asia Israel Tel Aviv 1 (tv1) Interhost GeoNodes LLC lis4o
6hvx2 UP :bar_chart: Asia India Navi Mumbai 1 (nm1) Rivram Rivram Inc mpmyf
w2sev UP :bar_chart: Asia India Panvel 2 (pl2) Yotta Krishna Enterprises 7rw6b
5mpdi UP :bar_chart: Asia Japan Tokyo 3 (ty3) Equinix Starbase a5glg
2ftux UP :bar_chart: Asia Korea (the Republic of) Seoul 1 (sl1) Megazone Cloud Neptune Partners ukji3
isegs UP :bar_chart: Asia Korea (the Republic of) Seoul 3 (kr1) KT Pindar Technology Limited iubpe
lxgqb UP :bar_chart: Asia Sri Lanka Colombo 1 (cm1) OrionStellar Geodd Pvt Ltd ywjtr
24fcm UP :bar_chart: Europe Lithuania Vilnius 1 (bt1) Baltneta MB Patrankos šūvis mbnsu
k2ovz UP :bar_chart: Europe Latvia Riga 3 (rg3) Nano Artem Horodyskyi bftbl
ouffe UP :bar_chart: Europe Poland Warszawa 3 (wa3) DataHouse Vladyslav Popov o36jk
74qsa UP :bar_chart: Europe Portugal Barreiro 1 (ba1) Online Maksym Ishchenko vezyg
jyh32 UP :bar_chart: Europe Romania Bucharest (bu1) M247 Iancu Aurel c5ssg
5gcqu UP :bar_chart: Europe Sweden Stockholm 1 (sh1) Digital Realty DFINITY Stiftung lgp6d
gsrhr UP :bar_chart: Asia Singapore Singapore (sg1) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital d4bin
gj6gc UP :bar_chart: Europe Slovenia Ljubljana 2 (lj2) Anonstake Anonstake eu5wc
ncr4b UP :bar_chart: Europe United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the) London 1 (ld1) Latitude.sh Conic Ventures raiov
m2g5i UP :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Houston (hu1) TRG 43rd Big Idea Films fthz3
ufciq UP :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Orlando (or1) Datasite Giant Leaf, LLC redpf
qknkg UP :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Sterling (st1) CyrusOne MI Servers tcn4t
noos2 UP :bar_chart: Africa South Africa Cape Town 2 (ct2) Teraco Kontrapunt (Pty) Ltd x7fjr
wazkf UP :bar_chart: Africa South Africa Gauteng 2 (jb2) Africa Data Centres Honeycomb Capital (Pty) Ltd 3bohy
q4ksz UP :bar_chart: Africa South Africa Gauteng 3 (jb3) Xneelo Wolkboer (Pty) Ltd ymenq

*This comment references the latest comment in the Subnet Management - General Discussion thread only to generate an automated cross-link from the general thread (to improve topic navigation).


You may wish to follow D-QUORUM if you found this analysis helpful.

Known Neurons to follow if you're too busy to keep on top of things like this

If you found this analysis helpful and would like to follow the vote of the LORIMER known neuron in the future, consider configuring LORIMER as a followee for the Subnet Management topic.

Additional good neurons to follow:

  • D-QUORUM (a highly decentralized neuron that follows neurons that have been elected by the NNS)
  • Synapse (currently follows the LORIMER and CodeGov known neurons for Subnet Management, and is a generally well informed known neuron to follow on numerous other topics)
  • WaterNeuron (the WaterNeuron DAO frequently discuss proposals like this in order to vote responsibly based on DAO consensus)

Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.