Thanks @Sat, nice work!
Proposal 132228
TLDR: I’ve adopted this proposal 
it brings this subnet closer to the IC target topology! 3 removed nodes replaced with nodes in France, Estonia, Switzerland to improve decentralisation.
Decentralisation Stats
Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →
| Smallest Distance | Average Distance | Largest Distance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EXISTING | 0 km | 8022.816 km | 19448.574 km |
| PROPOSED | 0 km (NaN%) | 7578.945 km (-5.5%) | 19448.574 km |
This proposal slightly reduces decentralisation, considered purely in terms of geographic distance (and therefore there’s a slight theoretical reduction in localised disaster resilience).
Subnet characteristic counts →
| Continents | Countries | Data Centers | Owners | Node Providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXISTING | 5 | 25 | 39 | 37 | 37 |
| PROPOSED | 5 | 27 (+7.4%) | 39 | 38 (+2.6%) | 37 |
This proposal improves decentralisation in terms of jurisdiction diversity and data center ownership diversity. 
Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →
| Continent | Country | Data Center | Owner | Node Provider | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXISTING | 14 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| PROPOSED | 17 (+21.429%) | 3 (-50%) | 2 | 2 | 2 |
See here for acceptable limits → Motion 132136. This proposal is a big step in bringing this subnet closer the IC target topology (it will now meet it regarding the country limit, which is great).
The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:
Map Description
- Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)
- Green marker represents an added node
- Blue marker represents an unchanged node
- Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)
- Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)
Table
Known Neurons to follow if you're too busy to keep on top of things like this
If you found this analysis helpful and would like to follow the vote of the LORIMER known neuron in the future, consider configuring LORIMER as a followee for the Subnet Management topic.
Other good neurons to follow:
-
Synapse (Synapse follows the LORIMER and CodeGov known neurons for Subnet Management, and is a generally well informed known neuron to follow on numerous other topics)
-
CodeGov (will soon be committed to actively reviewing and voting on Subnet Management proposals based on those reviews, and is well informed on numerous other technical topics)
-
WaterNeuron (the WaterNeuron DAO frequently discuss proposals like this in order to vote responsibly based on DAO consensus)