Subnet Management - qxesv (Application)

Proposal 135304 Review | LORIMER - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Replaces an offline node with an unassigned node, at the same data center and NP. This is the DFINITY-owned node of this subnet, so it’s important that it’s replaced with another node owned by DFINITY (making disaster recovery smoother).

Decentralisation Stats remain unchanged :+1:

Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

Smallest Distance Average Distance Largest Distance
EXISTING 305.949 km 6739.351 km 18504.433 km
PROPOSED 305.949 km 6739.351 km 18504.433 km

Subnet characteristic counts →

Continents Countries Data Centers Owners Node Providers Node Operator
EXISTING 3 13 13 13 13 13
PROPOSED 3 13 13 13 13 13

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
EXISTING 6 1 1 1 1 1
PROPOSED 6 1 1 1 1 1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 132136

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description
  • Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)
  • Green marker represents an added node
  • Blue marker represents an unchanged node
  • Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)
  • Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

Node Changes
Action Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
Remove uk6n5 DOWN :bar_chart: Europe Switzerland Zurich 2 (zh2) Everyware DFINITY Stiftung vqe65
Add 6qxes UNASSIGNED :bar_chart: Europe Switzerland Zurich 2 (zh2) Everyware DFINITY Stiftung pi3wm
Other Nodes
Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
ctwsk UP :bar_chart: Europe Belgium Brussels (br1) Digital Realty Allusion mjeqs
fvy7i UP :bar_chart: North America Costa Rica San José 1 (cr1) Navegalo GeoNodes LLC eqv2i
x3rso UP :bar_chart: Europe Germany Frankfurt 2 (fr2) Equinix Virtual Hive Ltd 3nu7r
sspbf UP :bar_chart: Asia Georgia Tbilisi 1 (tb1) Cloud9 George Bassadone yhfy4
lyhuu UP :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 1 (hk1) Unicom Pindar Technology Limited vzsx4
cxuqe UP :bar_chart: Asia India New Delhi 1 (nd1) Marvelous Web3 DC Marvelous Web3 ri4lg
pmlsj UP :bar_chart: Asia Korea (the Republic of) Seoul 1 (sl1) Megazone Cloud Neptune Partners ukji3
j7mu5 UP :bar_chart: Europe Portugal Lisbon 1 (li1) Dotsi Ivanov Oleksandr bnfpu
ys5ct UP :bar_chart: Europe Romania Bucharest (bu1) M247 Iancu Aurel c5ssg
ii5t4 UP :bar_chart: Asia Singapore Singapore 2 (sg2) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital qffmn
7tayv UP :bar_chart: Europe Slovenia Maribor (mb1) Posita.si Fractal Labs AG 3xiew
w5nh3 DOWN :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Allentown (aw1) Tierpoint Bigger Capital codio


You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron (coming soon) if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.


Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

1 Like