Subnet Management - pzp6e (Fiduciary)

Governance NNS proposal discussions
, ,
100

Proposal 135882 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES :white_check_mark:

TLDR:
The proposal replaces offline nodes in Zurich (Europe).
No issues were found in the nodes or locations proposed and decentralization stats remain the same. I vote to adopt

Provider Changes
Removed Added
Tomahawk.vc Bohatyrov Volodymyr
Location Changes
Removed Added
Europe, Zurich 4 Europe, Riga 3
Nodes Removed 1
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
ujv74… DOWN Tomahawk.vc zh4 Zurich 4
Nodes Added 1
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
3beeq… UNASSIGNED Bohatyrov Volodymyr rg3 Riga 3

:white_check_mark: Passes:

:white_check_mark: Node ujv74…: Health check passed.
:white_check_mark: Node ujv74…: Remove from Subnet check passed.
:white_check_mark: Node 3beeq…: Replacement Status check passed.

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

2 Likes