Subnet Management - pjljw (Application)

[Lorimer]

I’ve vote to reject proposal 134282. The proposal is inaccurate, and appears to have been the result of a typo. The proposal was announced here.

@Lorimer

Thanks for being upfront about this @katiep. So Proposal: 134282 (at least) should be rejected (posted here)

My perspective is that verification is not about asking the proposing entity if the proposal is okay, and then believing them when they say it’s okay (for this sort of reason, or worse). This isn’t how the IC should work.