Subnet Management - mpubz (Application)

A new proposal with ID 135844 has been submitted, please take a look.

Click here to open proposal details

Replace a node in subnet mpubz

Motivation:

  • replacing degraded node ked4e

Calculated potential impact on subnet decentralization if replacing:

  • 1 additional node would result in: equal decentralization across all features

Based on the calculated potential impact, not replacing additional nodes to improve optimization.

Note: the information below is provided for your convenience. Please independently verify the decentralization changes rather than relying solely on this summary.
Here is an explaination of how decentralization is currently calculated,
and there are also instructions for performing what-if analysis if you are wondering if another node would have improved decentralization more.

Decentralization Nakamoto coefficient changes for subnet mpubz-g52jc-grhjo-5oze5-qcj74-sex34-omprz-ivnsm-qvvhr-rfzpv-vae:

    node_provider: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
      data_center: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
data_center_owner: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
             area: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
          country: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)

Mean Nakamoto comparison: 5.00 → 5.00 (+0%)

Overall replacement impact: equal decentralization across all features

Details

Nodes removed:

  • ked4e-syml2-ao2ub-xgtxi-awdfd-2vkf6-lbol5-prycv-2vpb5-ws5jp-oae [health: degraded]

Nodes added:

  • 32yxi-hqan7-bhpqw-ypgjn-zq64m-6uqxs-htba2-sldaq-dkm7c-af3o5-vae [health: healthy]
    node_provider                                                              data_center            data_center_owner            area                   country   
    -------------                                                              -----------            -----------------            ----                   -------   
    4dibr-2alzr-h6kva-bvwn2-yqgsl-o577t-od46o-v275p-a2zov-tcw4f-eae       1    br2               1    AtlasEdge               1    Brussels Capital  1    AU       1
    64xe5-tx2s3-4gjmj-pnozr-fejw2-77y5y-rhcjk-glnmx-62brf-qin5q-pqe  0 -> 1    bu1               1    Cyxtera                 1    Bucuresti         1    BE       1
    6nbcy-kprg6-ax3db-kh3cz-7jllk-oceyh-jznhs-riguq-fvk6z-6tsds-rqe       1    fr2               1    Digital Realty          1    Florida           1    CA       1
    7at4h-nhtvt-a4s55-jigss-wr2ha-ysxkn-e6w7x-7ggnm-qd3d5-ry66r-cae       1    hk1          1 -> 0    Equinix                 1    Hesse             1    CH       1
    bvcsg-3od6r-jnydw-eysln-aql7w-td5zn-ay5m6-sibd2-jzojt-anwag-mqe       1    hk4          0 -> 1    M247                    1    HongKong          1    DE       1
    g2ax6-jrkmb-3zuh3-jibtb-q5xoq-njrgo-5utbc-j2o7g-zfq2w-yyhky-dqe  1 -> 0    jv1               1    Megazone Cloud          1    Maribor           1    HK       1
    i7dto-bgkj2-xo5dx-cyrb7-zkk5y-q46eh-gz6iq-qkgyc-w4qte-scgtb-6ae       1    mb1               1    NEXTDC                  1    Melbourne         1    IN       1
    ihbuj-erwnc-tkjux-tqtnv-zkoar-uniy2-sk2go-xfpkc-znbb4-seukm-wqe       1    mn2               1    Nine.Ch                 1    Ontario           1    KR       1
    rbn2y-6vfsb-gv35j-4cyvy-pzbdu-e5aum-jzjg6-5b4n5-vuguf-ycubq-zae       1    pl2               1    Posita.si               1    Panvel            1    RO       1
    spp3m-vawt7-3gyh6-pjz5d-6zidf-up3qb-yte62-otexv-vfpqg-n6awf-lqe       1    sg1               1    Telin                   1    Seoul             1    SE       1
    ucjqj-jmbj3-rs4aq-ekzpw-ltjs3-zrcma-t6r3t-m5wxc-j5yrj-unwoj-mae       1    sh1               1    Tierpoint               1    Singapore         1    SG       1
    wdjjk-blh44-lxm74-ojj43-rvgf4-j5rie-nm6xs-xvnuv-j3ptn-25t4v-6ae       1    sl1               1    Unicom             1 -> 0    Stockholm         1    SI       1
    wdnqm-clqti-im5yf-iapio-avjom-kyppl-xuiza-oaz6z-smmts-52wyg-5ae       1    to2               1    Yotta                   1    Zurich            1    US       1
    zy4m7-z5mhs-zfkpl-zlsjl-blrbx-mvvmq-5z4zu-mf7eq-hhv7o-ezfro-3ae       1    zh4               1    hkntt              0 -> 1                                     

Proposal 135844 Review | aligatorr - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Replaces degraded node.

  • Proposed topology Nakamoto Coefficient stayed the same as on current topology.
Node Changes 1 removed, 1 added
Node ID Status Country City Node Provider Data Center Data Center Owner
ked4e-syml2-ao2ub-xgtxi-awdfd-2vkf6-lbol5-prycv-2vpb5-ws5jp-oae32yxi-hqan7-bhpqw-ypgjn-zq64m-6uqxs-htba2-sldaq-dkm7c-af3o5-vae DEGRADED → UNASSIGNED HKHK HongKongHongKong Wancloud limitedWeb3game hk1hk4 Unicomhkntt
Current Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00
Attribute Nakamoto Coefficient Identical attribute values Max allowed identical values Unique Counts
Country 5 3 13
City 5 1 13
Data Center 5 1 13
Data Center Owner 5 1 13
Node Provider ID 5 1 13
Proposed Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00
Attribute Nakamoto Coefficient Identical attribute values Max allowed identical values Unique Counts
Country 5 3 13
City 5 1 13
Data Center 5 1 13
Data Center Owner 5 1 13
Node Provider ID 5 1 13

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals.
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals.
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

1 Like

Proposal 135844 | Tim - CodeGov

Vote: Adopt

This proposal replaces 1 node in subnet mpubz, appearing in the decentralization tool as “DEGRADED”. As shown in the proposal, decentralisation parameters are unchanged and remain within the requirements of the target topology.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neurons’ Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralisation of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

1 Like

Proposal 135844 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES :white_check_mark:

TLDR:
The proposal replaces Degrade node in Hongkong(Asia) a DC wide outage as per previous proposal. No issues were found in the nodes or locations proposed and decentralization stats remain the same. I vote to adopt

Provider Changes
Removed Added
Wancloud limited Web3game
Location Changes
Removed Added
Asia, HongKong 1 Asia, HongKong 4
Nodes Removed 1
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
ked4e… DEGRADED Wancloud limited hk1 HongKong 1
Nodes Added 1
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
32yxi… UNASSIGNED Web3game hk4 HongKong 4

:white_check_mark: Passes:

:white_check_mark: Node ked4e…: Health check passed.
:white_check_mark: Node ked4e…: Remove from Subnet check passed.
:white_check_mark: Node 32yxi…: Replacement Status check passed.

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

Proposal 135844 Review | Lorimer - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Degraded node replaced by an unassigned node. Decentralisation stats are unchanged. LGTM :+1:

Country Discrepancies (2)

The Canada / US discrepancy covers a large distances and needs closer attention at some point (not affected by this proposal).

Node Data Center Claimed Country According to ipinfo.io
7r7kx Toronto 2 Canada United States of America (the)
rhy7d Brussels 2 Belgium United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the)
Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

Smallest Distance Average Distance Largest Distance
EXISTING 304.712 km 7615.32 km 16616.248 km
PROPOSED 304.712 km 7613.546 km 16616.248 km

Subnet characteristic counts →

Continents Countries Data Centers Owners Node Providers Node Operator
EXISTING 4 13 13 13 13 13
PROPOSED 4 13 13 13 13 13

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
EXISTING 6 1 1 1 1 1
PROPOSED 6 1 1 1 1 1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 135700

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description
  • Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)

  • Green marker represents an added node

  • Blue marker represents an unchanged node

  • Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

  • Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

  • Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to ipinfo.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.

Node Changes
Action Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
Remove ked4e DEGRADED :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 1 (hk1) Unicom Wancloud limited z6cfb
Add 32yxi UNASSIGNED :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 4 (hk4) hkntt Web3game dg7of
Other Nodes
Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
onv2n UP :bar_chart: Oceania Australia Melbourne 2 (mn2) NEXTDC Icaria Systems Pty Ltd l5lhp
rhy7d UP :bar_chart: Europe Belgium Brussels 2 (br2) AtlasEdge Allusion oorkg
7r7kx UP :bar_chart: North America Canada Toronto 2 (to2) Cyxtera Blockchain Development Labs 4lp6i
d2ffc UP :bar_chart: Europe Switzerland Zurich 4 (zh4) Nine.Ch Tomahawk.vc paxme
4rpiz UP :bar_chart: Europe Germany Frankfurt 2 (fr2) Equinix Virtual Hive Ltd 3nu7r
2dzst UP :bar_chart: Asia India Panvel 2 (pl2) Yotta Krishna Enterprises 7rw6b
kegk5 UP :bar_chart: Asia Korea (the Republic of) Seoul 1 (sl1) Megazone Cloud Neptune Partners ukji3
b3knf UP :bar_chart: Europe Romania Bucharest (bu1) M247 Iancu Aurel c5ssg
4xhpj UP :bar_chart: Europe Sweden Stockholm 1 (sh1) Digital Realty DFINITY Stiftung lgp6d
wz42c UP :bar_chart: Asia Singapore Singapore (sg1) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital d4bin
scjri UP :bar_chart: Europe Slovenia Maribor (mb1) Posita.si Fractal Labs AG 3xiew
jiogo UP :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Jacksonville (jv1) Tierpoint Rivonia Holdings LLC stqij


You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron (coming soon) if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.


Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

1 Like

Proposal #135844 — Zack | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted

Reason:
The proposal replaces Degraded status node ked4e from Hong Kong with
unassigned healthy Awaiting status node 32yxi from Hong Kong4 without any change to decentralization.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

2 Likes

Proposal 135844 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

Replaces degraded node ked4e Dashboard Status: Degraded with node 32yxi Dashboard Status: Awaiting on subnet mpubz.

The proposal makes a necessary replacement by removing the degraded node.

There is no impact in the decentralization.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

2 Likes

A new proposal with ID 136579 has been submitted, please take a look.

Click here to open proposal details

Replace a node in subnet mpubz

Motivation:

  • replacing cordoned node 32yxi (freeing up nodes from Web3game in order to update ipv6)

Calculated potential impact on subnet decentralization if replacing:

  • 1 additional node would result in: equal decentralization across all features

Based on the calculated potential impact, not replacing additional nodes to improve optimization.

Note: the information below is provided for your convenience. Please independently verify the decentralization changes rather than relying solely on this summary.
Here is an explaination of how decentralization is currently calculated,
and there are also instructions for performing what-if analysis if you are wondering if another node would have improved decentralization more.

Decentralization Nakamoto coefficient changes for subnet mpubz-g52jc-grhjo-5oze5-qcj74-sex34-omprz-ivnsm-qvvhr-rfzpv-vae:

    node_provider: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
      data_center: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
data_center_owner: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
             area: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
          country: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)

Mean Nakamoto comparison: 5.00 → 5.00 (+0%)

Overall replacement impact: equal decentralization across all features

Details

Nodes removed:

  • 32yxi-hqan7-bhpqw-ypgjn-zq64m-6uqxs-htba2-sldaq-dkm7c-af3o5-vae [health: healthy]

Nodes added:

  • dur57-qqxpo-wmql5-bd7cz-atitx-5ivxi-ht3ni-lvb43-ms4w4-uyep4-iae [health: healthy]
    node_provider                                                              data_center            data_center_owner            area                        country        
    -------------                                                              -----------            -----------------            ----                        -------        
    4dibr-2alzr-h6kva-bvwn2-yqgsl-o577t-od46o-v275p-a2zov-tcw4f-eae       1    br2               1    AtlasEdge               1    Brussels Capital       1    AU            1
    64xe5-tx2s3-4gjmj-pnozr-fejw2-77y5y-rhcjk-glnmx-62brf-qin5q-pqe  1 -> 0    bu1               1    Cloud9             0 -> 1    Bucuresti              1    BE            1
    6nbcy-kprg6-ax3db-kh3cz-7jllk-oceyh-jznhs-riguq-fvk6z-6tsds-rqe       1    fr2               1    Cyxtera                 1    Florida                1    CA            1
    7at4h-nhtvt-a4s55-jigss-wr2ha-ysxkn-e6w7x-7ggnm-qd3d5-ry66r-cae       1    hk4          1 -> 0    Digital Realty          1    Hesse                  1    CH            1
    bvcsg-3od6r-jnydw-eysln-aql7w-td5zn-ay5m6-sibd2-jzojt-anwag-mqe       1    jv1               1    Equinix                 1    HongKong          1 -> 0    DE            1
    i7dto-bgkj2-xo5dx-cyrb7-zkk5y-q46eh-gz6iq-qkgyc-w4qte-scgtb-6ae       1    mb1               1    M247                    1    Maribor                1    GE       0 -> 1
    ihbuj-erwnc-tkjux-tqtnv-zkoar-uniy2-sk2go-xfpkc-znbb4-seukm-wqe       1    mn2               1    Megazone Cloud          1    Melbourne              1    HK       1 -> 0
    rbn2y-6vfsb-gv35j-4cyvy-pzbdu-e5aum-jzjg6-5b4n5-vuguf-ycubq-zae       1    pl2               1    NEXTDC                  1    Ontario                1    IN            1
    spp3m-vawt7-3gyh6-pjz5d-6zidf-up3qb-yte62-otexv-vfpqg-n6awf-lqe       1    sg1               1    Nine.Ch                 1    Panvel                 1    KR            1
    ucjqj-jmbj3-rs4aq-ekzpw-ltjs3-zrcma-t6r3t-m5wxc-j5yrj-unwoj-mae       1    sh1               1    Posita.si               1    Seoul                  1    RO            1
    vegae-c4chr-aetfj-7gzuh-c23sx-u2paz-vmvbn-bcage-pu7lu-mptnn-eqe  0 -> 1    sl1               1    Telin                   1    Singapore              1    SE            1
    wdjjk-blh44-lxm74-ojj43-rvgf4-j5rie-nm6xs-xvnuv-j3ptn-25t4v-6ae       1    tb1          0 -> 1    Tierpoint               1    Stockholm              1    SG            1
    wdnqm-clqti-im5yf-iapio-avjom-kyppl-xuiza-oaz6z-smmts-52wyg-5ae       1    to2               1    Yotta                   1    Tbilisi           0 -> 1    SI            1
    zy4m7-z5mhs-zfkpl-zlsjl-blrbx-mvvmq-5z4zu-mf7eq-hhv7o-ezfro-3ae       1    zh4               1    hkntt              1 -> 0    Zurich                 1    US            1

Proposal 136579 Review | Lorimer - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: NO

TLDR: This proposal suggests swapping a healthy node out of the subnet because it’s considered ‘cordoned’, but no evidence is provided for voters to follow up on this claim (to gain confidence about its validity, e.g. a link to public discussion with the node provider confirming their intentions).

This is a requirement that has been brought up as necessary time and again. I do not wish for proposals like this to continue being normalised. Nudging nodes in and out of subnets is an operation that carries significant security implications, and all the supporting evidence/justification for the swap should be provided in the proposal summary (it’s not something voters should be expected to have to hunt for).

Related context:

Country Discrepancies (1)

@alexu, can I ask where RIPE Atlas locates this node? I’ve not yet set myself up on the network, so don’t have any credits in order to check. I also noticed that my prior checks on an earlier discussion using ipinfo.io may have been inaccurate simply due to a stale local cache that I was using. I’ve just cleared it out and these are the results I’m getting for this node at the moment. Curious to see how that matches up with what you get.

Node Data Center Claimed Country According to ipinfo.io
7r7kx Toronto 2 Canada United States of America (the)
Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

Smallest Distance Average Distance Largest Distance
EXISTING 304.712 km 7613.546 km 16616.248 km
PROPOSED 304.712 km 7234.188 km (-5%) 16616.248 km

This proposal slightly reduces decentralisation, considered purely in terms of geographic distance (and therefore there’s a slight theoretical reduction in localised disaster resilience). :-1:

Subnet characteristic counts →

Continents Countries Data Centers Owners Node Providers Node Operator
EXISTING 4 13 13 13 13 13
PROPOSED 4 13 13 13 13 13

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
EXISTING 6 1 1 1 1 1
PROPOSED 6 1 1 1 1 1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 135700

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description
  • Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)

  • Green marker represents an added node

  • Blue marker represents an unchanged node

  • Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

  • Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

  • Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to ipinfo.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.

Node Changes
Action Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
Remove 32yxi UP :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 4 (hk4) hkntt Web3game dg7of
Add dur57 UNASSIGNED :bar_chart: Asia Georgia Tbilisi 1 (tb1) Cloud9 George Bassadone yhfy4
Other Nodes
Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
onv2n UP :bar_chart: Oceania Australia Melbourne 2 (mn2) NEXTDC Icaria Systems Pty Ltd l5lhp
rhy7d UP :bar_chart: Europe Belgium Brussels 2 (br2) AtlasEdge Allusion oorkg
7r7kx UP :bar_chart: North America Canada Toronto 2 (to2) Cyxtera Blockchain Development Labs 4lp6i
d2ffc UP :bar_chart: Europe Switzerland Zurich 4 (zh4) Nine.Ch Tomahawk.vc paxme
4rpiz UP :bar_chart: Europe Germany Frankfurt 2 (fr2) Equinix Virtual Hive Ltd 3nu7r
2dzst UP :bar_chart: Asia India Panvel 2 (pl2) Yotta Krishna Enterprises 7rw6b
kegk5 UP :bar_chart: Asia Korea (the Republic of) Seoul 1 (sl1) Megazone Cloud Neptune Partners ukji3
b3knf UP :bar_chart: Europe Romania Bucharest (bu1) M247 Iancu Aurel c5ssg
4xhpj UP :bar_chart: Europe Sweden Stockholm 1 (sh1) Digital Realty DFINITY Stiftung lgp6d
wz42c UP :bar_chart: Asia Singapore Singapore (sg1) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital d4bin
scjri UP :bar_chart: Europe Slovenia Maribor (mb1) Posita.si Fractal Labs AG 3xiew
jiogo UP :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Jacksonville (jv1) Tierpoint Rivonia Holdings LLC stqij


You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.


Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

2 Likes
1 Like

Proposal 136579 | Tim - CodeGov

Vote: Adopt

This proposal replaces 1 node in subnet mpubz, appearing in the decentralization tool as “UP”, at the request of its node provider (Web3game). As shown in the proposal, decentralisation parameters are unchanged and remain within the requirements of the target topology.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neurons’ Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralisation of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

Proposal 136579 Review | aligatorr - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Replaces node from Web3game, they are doing an upgrade on their infra.

  • Proposed topology Nakamoto Coefficient stayed the same as on current topology.
Node Changes 1 removed, 1 added
Node ID Status Country City Node Provider Data Center Data Center Owner
32yxi-hqan7-bhpqw-ypgjn-zq64m-6uqxs-htba2-sldaq-dkm7c-af3o5-vaedur57-qqxpo-wmql5-bd7cz-atitx-5ivxi-ht3ni-lvb43-ms4w4-uyep4-iae UP → UNASSIGNED HKGE HongKongTbilisi Web3gameGeorge Bassadone hk4tb1 hknttCloud9
Current Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00
Attribute Nakamoto Coefficient Identical attribute values Max allowed identical values Unique Counts
Country 5 3 13
City 5 1 13
Data Center 5 1 13
Data Center Owner 5 1 13
Node Provider ID 5 1 13
Proposed Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00
Attribute Nakamoto Coefficient Identical attribute values Max allowed identical values Unique Counts
Country 5 3 13
City 5 1 13
Data Center 5 1 13
Data Center Owner 5 1 13
Node Provider ID 5 1 13

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals.
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals.
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

Proposal 136579 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES :white_check_mark:

TLDR:
The proposal replaces node in subnet x33ed… (application). As claimed by NP they will be undergoing IPv4 and IPv6 change, decentralisation stats remain the same. Vote to adopt.

@alexu, is there any reason why the DRE tool selects Tbilisi 1 DC for swapping nodes in most cases? I think I have brought this up in a few proposals before.

Subnet Details
Property Value
ID mpubz…
Type application
Memory Usage 341.21 GB
Running Canisters 55403
Description N/A
Provider Changes
Removed Added
Web3game George Bassadone
Location Changes
Removed Added
Asia, HongKong 4 Asia, Tbilisi 1
Nodes Removed 1
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
32yxi… UP Web3game hk4 HongKong 4
Nodes Added 1
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
dur57… UNASSIGNED George Bassadone tb1 Tbilisi 1

:white_check_mark: Passes:

:white_check_mark: Node 32yxi…: Remove from Subnet check passed.
:white_check_mark: Node dur57…: Replacement Status check passed.

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

1 Like

Proposal 136579 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

The proposal replaces a cordoned node on subnet mpubz:

  • removes cordoned node 32yxi Dashboard Status: Active.
  • adds node dur57 Dashboard Status: Awaiting.

There is no impact in the decentralization metrics.

As explained in this post and verified by the NP here the cordoned node is being removed in order to redeploy it due to getting new IPv4 and IPv6 ranges.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

Hi~ Dear community and official members,

After our efforts in communicating with the network provider, we are able to renew the contract, so there will be no need to change IPv4 and IPv6. I understand this has wasted everyone’s time and effort. We sincerely apologize for this!! So sorry!!

I would like to ask, if we do not make any changes (IPv4/IPv6), is it possible to withdraw the subnet removal request?

Or has the proposal already progressed to the point where it cannot be withdrawn? Do we have to wait for the subnet to be removed first, and then, without making any changes, will the subnet be automatically added back later?

Proposal #136579 — Zack | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted

Reason:
The proposal replaces cordoned node 32yxi (freeing up nodes from Web3game in order to update ipv6).

OBS: meanwhile the NP is asking for the proposals to be rejected. “there will be no need to change IPv4 and IPv6”.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.