Hi @alexu, I’ve rejected most of the proposals relating to Web3 game nodes based on the following reasoning and context →
I’m obviously only one voter among a teams of reviewers in CO.DELTA. For the benefit of reviews and votes that follow, could you please provide a reference to public discussion with the node provider in question (as a means of corroborating the claims in the proposal i.e. that this node provider is in fact expecting and aligned with these proposals, given that there’s no other reason for performing the node swap)?
I gave more commentary about my stance on this in this proposal review, but if there’s anything unclear about why I consider this sort of thing to be so important, please let me know so that I can clarify. Thanks.