Subnet Management - mpubz (Application)

Governance NNS proposal discussions
, ,
73

Proposal 136579 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES :white_check_mark:

TLDR:
The proposal replaces node in subnet x33ed… (application). As claimed by NP they will be undergoing IPv4 and IPv6 change, decentralisation stats remain the same. Vote to adopt.

@alexu, is there any reason why the DRE tool selects Tbilisi 1 DC for swapping nodes in most cases? I think I have brought this up in a few proposals before.

Subnet Details
Property Value
ID mpubz…
Type application
Memory Usage 341.21 GB
Running Canisters 55403
Description N/A
Provider Changes
Removed Added
Web3game George Bassadone
Location Changes
Removed Added
Asia, HongKong 4 Asia, Tbilisi 1
Nodes Removed 1
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
32yxi… UP Web3game hk4 HongKong 4
Nodes Added 1
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
dur57… UNASSIGNED George Bassadone tb1 Tbilisi 1

:white_check_mark: Passes:

:white_check_mark: Node 32yxi…: Remove from Subnet check passed.
:white_check_mark: Node dur57…: Replacement Status check passed.

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

1 Like