Proposal 135989 Review | Lorimer - CO.DELTA △
VOTE: No
TLDR: This is review 
The proposal appears to have been submitted in error.
- No meaningful proposal summary
- No link to a forum post where voters can easily go to see critical discussion
- There are numerous issues with the nodes proposed to be add/removed, described below the map
Every network needs a chaos monkey. It’s helped me spot some things I can improve about my review tooling.
Country Discrepancies (2)
Large distance discrepancy for the Canada/US node. However this node is not affected by this proposal (just something to revisit at a later date).
| Node | Data Center | Claimed Country | According to ipinfo.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| jxgxw | Brussels 2 | Belgium | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the) |
| jyjmn | Toronto 2 | Canada | United States of America (the) |
Map Description
-
Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)
-
Green marker represents an added node
-
Blue marker represents an unchanged node
-
Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)
-
Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)
-
Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to
ipinfo.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.
Node Changes
| Action | Node | Status | Continent | Country | Data Center | Owner | Node Provider | Node Operator | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Invalid (not in subnet) |
Remove |  |
||||||||
| Invalid (not in subnet) |
Remove | |
||||||||
| Invalid (not in subnet) |
Remove | |
||||||||
| Invalid (matches removal node) |
Add | f7hyn | UP | |
North America | Canada | Quebec l1 (mtl1) | Leaseweb | Marvelous Web3 | ueggl |
| Invalid (already belongs to subnet) |
Add | x6ufc | UP | |
Asia | India | New Delhi 1 (nd1) | Marvelous Web3 DC | Marvelous Web3 | ri4lg |
| Invalid (matches removal node) |
Add | dwcjo | UP | |
North America | United States of America (the) | Jacksonville (jv1) | Tierpoint | Rivonia Holdings LLC | stqij |
Other Nodes
| Node | Status | Continent | Country | Data Center | Owner | Node Provider | Node Operator | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| jxgxw | UP | |
Europe | Belgium | Brussels 2 (br2) | AtlasEdge | Allusion | oorkg |
| jyjmn | UP | |
North America | Canada | Toronto 2 (to2) | Cyxtera | Blockchain Development Labs | 4lp6i |
| nf5ha | UP | |
Europe | Switzerland | Geneva (ge1) | HighDC | Extragone SA | yngfj |
| bwicx | UP | |
Europe | Germany | Frankfurt 2 (fr2) | Equinix | Virtual Hive Ltd | 3nu7r |
| uj5bp | UP | |
Asia | Hong Kong | HongKong 1 (hk1) | Unicom | Pindar Technology Limited | vzsx4 |
| itcju | UP | |
Asia | Korea (the Republic of) | Seoul 1 (sl1) | Megazone Cloud | Neptune Partners | ukji3 |
| gd36t | UP | |
Europe | Poland | Warszawa 1 (wa1) | LIM DC | Maksym Ishchenko | npluh |
| ywict | UP | |
Europe | Sweden | Stockholm 1 (sh1) | Digital Realty | DFINITY Stiftung | lgp6d |
| dapyz | UP | |
Asia | Singapore | Singapore 2 (sg2) | Telin | OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital | qffmn |
| np4ih | UP | |
Europe | Slovenia | Ljubljana (lj1) | Posita.si | Fractal Labs AG | gl27f |
| lxebw | UP | |
North America | United States of America (the) | Dallas (dl1) | Flexential | 87m Neuron, LLC | mw64v |
| g5zt4 | UP | |
Africa | South Africa | Cape Town 1 (ct1) | Africa Data Centres | Illusions In Art (Pty) Ltd | 2aemz |
You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.
CO.DELTA △
We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:
- Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
- Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
- Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.
Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.
Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.