Subnet Management - jtdsg (Application)

Proposal 135843 Review | aligatorr - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Replaces 1 unhealthy and 1 degraded node.

  • Proposed topology Nakamoto Coefficient stayed the same as on current topology.
Node Changes 2 removed, 2 added
Node ID Status Country City Node Provider Data Center Data Center Owner
3beeq-bvtv4-mxeff-2ypcm-jnw74-envji-bflpz-sipbb-e6gnt-kfptx-5qefemah-ntebg-2txyb-6ixyr-kl62n-aoqmx-pxu7y-imzup-o72wc-qfosh-kae DOWN → UNASSIGNED LVGE RigaTbilisi Bohatyrov VolodymyrGeorge Bassadone rg3tb1 NanoCloud9
oe52f-su776-yflut-ihohm-rm7gp-47fvy-alweq-ndg3i-g5uci-qzcvo-jqes5waw-pnvds-kpwqg-n6bly-r45vy-ax64x-sltbe-bbzl3-74npl-u4sos-mae DEGRADED → UNASSIGNED HKHK HongKongHongKong Wancloud limitedWeb3game hk1hk4 Unicomhkntt
Current Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00
Attribute Nakamoto Coefficient Identical attribute values Max allowed identical values Unique Counts
Country 5 3 13
City 5 1 13
Data Center 5 1 13
Data Center Owner 5 1 13
Node Provider ID 5 1 13
Proposed Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00
Attribute Nakamoto Coefficient Identical attribute values Max allowed identical values Unique Counts
Country 5 3 13
City 5 1 13
Data Center 5 1 13
Data Center Owner 5 1 13
Node Provider ID 5 1 13

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals.
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals.
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

1 Like

Proposal 135843 | Tim - CodeGov

Vote: Adopt

This proposal replaces 2 nodes in subnet jtdsg, one appearing in the decentralization tool as “DOWN”, and the second node appearing as “DEGRADED”. As shown in the proposal, decentralisation parameters are unchanged and remain within the requirements of the target topology.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neurons’ Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralisation of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

1 Like

Proposal 135843 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES :white_check_mark:

TLDR:
The proposal replaces offline and degraded nodes in Riga(Eu) and Hongkong(Asia).
No issues were found in the nodes or locations proposed and decentralization stats remain the same. I vote to adopt

Provider Changes
Removed Added
Bohatyrov Volodymyr Web3game
Wancloud limited George Bassadone
Location Changes
Removed Added
Europe, Riga 3 Asia, HongKong 4
Asia, HongKong 1 Asia, Tbilisi 1
Nodes Removed 2
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
3beeq… DOWN Bohatyrov Volodymyr rg3 Riga 3
oe52f… DEGRADED Wancloud limited hk1 HongKong 1
Nodes Added 2
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
s5waw… UNASSIGNED Web3game hk4 HongKong 4
femah… UNASSIGNED George Bassadone tb1 Tbilisi 1

:white_check_mark: Passes:

:white_check_mark: Node 3beeq…: Health check passed.
:white_check_mark: Node 3beeq…: Remove from Subnet check passed.
:white_check_mark: Node oe52f…: Health check passed.
:white_check_mark: Node oe52f…: Remove from Subnet check passed.
:white_check_mark: Node s5waw…: Replacement Status check passed.
:white_check_mark: Node femah…: Replacement Status check passed.

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

Proposal 135843 Review | Lorimer - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Replaces a dead and degraded node, as can be seen below. Relevant Decentralisation Stats are unchanged (expand below for details). LGTM :slightly_smiling_face:

Country Discrepancies (2)

One of these discrepancies is very large and needs revisiting at some point (this proposal doesn’t affect the node in question).

Node Data Center Claimed Country According to ipinfo.io
dsnjt Toronto 2 Canada United States of America (the)
rphlf Brussels Belgium France
Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

Smallest Distance Average Distance Largest Distance
EXISTING 478.364 km 8442.15 km 16654.257 km
PROPOSED 478.364 km 8469.976 km (+0.3%) 16654.257 km

This proposal slightly increases decentralisation, considered purely in terms of geographic distance (and therefore there’s a slight theoretical increase in localised disaster resilience). :+1:

Subnet characteristic counts →

Continents Countries Data Centers Owners Node Providers Node Operator
EXISTING 5 13 13 13 13 13
PROPOSED 5 13 13 13 13 13

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
EXISTING 5 1 1 1 1 1
PROPOSED 5 1 1 1 1 1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 135700

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description
  • Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)

  • Green marker represents an added node

  • Blue marker represents an unchanged node

  • Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

  • Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

  • Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to ipinfo.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.

Node Changes
Action Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
Remove oe52f DEGRADED :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 1 (hk1) Unicom Wancloud limited z6cfb
Remove 3beeq DOWN :bar_chart: Europe Latvia Riga 3 (rg3) Nano Bohatyrov Volodymyr 6igux
Add femah UNASSIGNED :bar_chart: Asia Georgia Tbilisi 1 (tb1) Cloud9 George Bassadone yhfy4
Add s5waw UNASSIGNED :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 4 (hk4) hkntt Web3game dg7of
Other Nodes
Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
4y5k6 UP :bar_chart: Oceania Australia Queensland 1 (sc1) NEXTDC Karel Frank f3toa
rphlf UP :bar_chart: Europe Belgium Brussels (br1) Digital Realty Allusion mjeqs
dsnjt UP :bar_chart: North America Canada Toronto 2 (to2) Cyxtera Blockchain Development Labs 4lp6i
gtc2a UP :bar_chart: Europe Switzerland Zurich 2 (zh2) Everyware DFINITY Stiftung vqe65
nioyi UP :bar_chart: Asia Japan Tokyo 3 (ty3) Equinix Starbase a5glg
vt5q3 UP :bar_chart: Asia Korea (the Republic of) Seoul 1 (sl1) Megazone Cloud Neptune Partners ukji3
pym4f UP :bar_chart: Europe Romania Bucharest (bu1) M247 Iancu Aurel c5ssg
tjg3r UP :bar_chart: Asia Singapore Singapore (sg1) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital d4bin
i5kts UP :bar_chart: Europe Slovenia Ljubljana (lj1) Posita.si Fractal Labs AG gl27f
ifjiy UP :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Orlando (or1) Datasite Giant Leaf, LLC 2rqo7
4c63m UP :bar_chart: Africa South Africa Cape Town 2 (ct2) Teraco Kontrapunt (Pty) Ltd x7fjr


You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron (coming soon) if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.


Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

Proposal #135843 — Zack | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted

Reason:
The proposal replaces dead Offline status node 3beeq from Riga and Degraded status node oe52f from Hong Kong with
unassigned healthy Awaiting status node s5waw from Hong Kong4 and unassigned healthy Awaiting status node femah from Georgia without any change to decentralization.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

1 Like

Proposal 135843 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

The proposal replaces one dead node along with another degraded node on subnet jtdsg:

  • dead node 3beeq Dashboard Status: Active and degrade node oe52f Dashboard Status: Degraded.

with nodes:

  • node s5waw Dashboard Status: Awaiting and node femah Dashboard Status: Awaiting.

There is no impact in the decentralization.

The dead node currently shows as Active but it can be seen in Node Provider Rewards that it has been having issues in the past days.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

1 Like