Subnet Management - jtdsg (Application)

[aligatorr89]

Proposal 135843 Review | aligatorr - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Replaces 1 unhealthy and 1 degraded node.

• Proposed topology Nakamoto Coefficient stayed the same as on current topology.

Node Changes 2 removed, 2 added

Node ID	Status	Country	City	Node Provider	Data Center	Data Center Owner
3beeq-bvtv4-mxeff-2ypcm-jnw74-envji-bflpz-sipbb-e6gnt-kfptx-5qe → femah-ntebg-2txyb-6ixyr-kl62n-aoqmx-pxu7y-imzup-o72wc-qfosh-kae	DOWN → UNASSIGNED	LV → GE	Riga → Tbilisi	Bohatyrov Volodymyr → George Bassadone	rg3 → tb1	Nano → Cloud9
oe52f-su776-yflut-ihohm-rm7gp-47fvy-alweq-ndg3i-g5uci-qzcvo-jqe → s5waw-pnvds-kpwqg-n6bly-r45vy-ax64x-sltbe-bbzl3-74npl-u4sos-mae	DEGRADED → UNASSIGNED	HK → HK	HongKong → HongKong	Wancloud limited → Web3game	hk1 → hk4	Unicom → hkntt

Current Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00

Attribute	Nakamoto Coefficient	Identical attribute values	Max allowed identical values	Unique Counts
Country	5		3	13
City	5		1	13
Data Center	5		1	13
Data Center Owner	5		1	13
Node Provider ID	5		1	13

Proposed Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00

Attribute	Nakamoto Coefficient	Identical attribute values	Max allowed identical values	Unique Counts
Country	5		3	13
City	5		1	13
Data Center	5		1	13
Data Center Owner	5		1	13
Node Provider ID	5		1	13

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals.
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals.
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

[timk11]

Proposal 135843 | Tim - CodeGov

Vote: Adopt

This proposal replaces 2 nodes in subnet jtdsg, one appearing in the decentralization tool as “DOWN”, and the second node appearing as “DEGRADED”. As shown in the proposal, decentralisation parameters are unchanged and remain within the requirements of the target topology.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neurons’ Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralisation of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

[MalithHatananchchige]

Proposal 135843 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR:
The proposal replaces offline and degraded nodes in Riga(Eu) and Hongkong(Asia).
No issues were found in the nodes or locations proposed and decentralization stats remain the same. I vote to adopt

Provider Changes

Removed	Added
Bohatyrov Volodymyr	Web3game
Wancloud limited	George Bassadone

Location Changes

Removed	Added
Europe, Riga 3	Asia, HongKong 4
Asia, HongKong 1	Asia, Tbilisi 1

Nodes Removed 2

Node ID	Status	Provider	Data Center	Location
3beeq…	DOWN	Bohatyrov Volodymyr	rg3	Riga 3
oe52f…	DEGRADED	Wancloud limited	hk1	HongKong 1

Nodes Added 2

Node ID	Status	Provider	Data Center	Location
s5waw…	UNASSIGNED	Web3game	hk4	HongKong 4
femah…	UNASSIGNED	George Bassadone	tb1	Tbilisi 1

Passes:

Node 3beeq…: Health check passed.
Node 3beeq…: Remove from Subnet check passed.
Node oe52f…: Health check passed.
Node oe52f…: Remove from Subnet check passed.
Node s5waw…: Replacement Status check passed.
Node femah…: Replacement Status check passed.

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

[Lorimer]

Proposal 135843 Review | Lorimer - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Replaces a dead and degraded node, as can be seen below. Relevant Decentralisation Stats are unchanged (expand below for details). LGTM

Country Discrepancies (2)

One of these discrepancies is very large and needs revisiting at some point (this proposal doesn’t affect the node in question).

Node	Data Center	Claimed Country	According to ipinfo.io
dsnjt	Toronto 2	Canada	United States of America (the)
rphlf	Brussels	Belgium	France

Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

	Smallest Distance	Average Distance	Largest Distance
EXISTING	478.364 km	8442.15 km	16654.257 km
PROPOSED	478.364 km	8469.976 km (+0.3%)	16654.257 km

This proposal slightly increases decentralisation, considered purely in terms of geographic distance (and therefore there’s a slight theoretical increase in localised disaster resilience).

Subnet characteristic counts →

	Continents	Countries	Data Centers	Owners	Node Providers	Node Operator
EXISTING	5	13	13	13	13	13
PROPOSED	5	13	13	13	13	13

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

	Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
EXISTING	5	1	1	1	1	1
PROPOSED	5	1	1	1	1	1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 135700

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description

• Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)

• Green marker represents an added node

• Blue marker represents an unchanged node

• Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

• Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

• Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to ipinfo.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.

Node Changes

Action	Node	Status		Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
Remove	oe52f	DEGRADED		Asia	Hong Kong	HongKong 1 (hk1)	Unicom	Wancloud limited	z6cfb
Remove	3beeq	DOWN		Europe	Latvia	Riga 3 (rg3)	Nano	Bohatyrov Volodymyr	6igux
Add	femah	UNASSIGNED		Asia	Georgia	Tbilisi 1 (tb1)	Cloud9	George Bassadone	yhfy4
Add	s5waw	UNASSIGNED		Asia	Hong Kong	HongKong 4 (hk4)	hkntt	Web3game	dg7of

Other Nodes

Node	Status		Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
4y5k6	UP		Oceania	Australia	Queensland 1 (sc1)	NEXTDC	Karel Frank	f3toa
rphlf	UP		Europe	Belgium	Brussels (br1)	Digital Realty	Allusion	mjeqs
dsnjt	UP		North America	Canada	Toronto 2 (to2)	Cyxtera	Blockchain Development Labs	4lp6i
gtc2a	UP		Europe	Switzerland	Zurich 2 (zh2)	Everyware	DFINITY Stiftung	vqe65
nioyi	UP		Asia	Japan	Tokyo 3 (ty3)	Equinix	Starbase	a5glg
vt5q3	UP		Asia	Korea (the Republic of)	Seoul 1 (sl1)	Megazone Cloud	Neptune Partners	ukji3
pym4f	UP		Europe	Romania	Bucharest (bu1)	M247	Iancu Aurel	c5ssg
tjg3r	UP		Asia	Singapore	Singapore (sg1)	Telin	OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital	d4bin
i5kts	UP		Europe	Slovenia	Ljubljana (lj1)	Posita.si	Fractal Labs AG	gl27f
ifjiy	UP		North America	United States of America (the)	Orlando (or1)	Datasite	Giant Leaf, LLC	2rqo7
4c63m	UP		Africa	South Africa	Cape Town 2 (ct2)	Teraco	Kontrapunt (Pty) Ltd	x7fjr

---

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron (coming soon) if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

---

Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

[ZackDS]

Proposal #135843 — Zack | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted

Reason:
The proposal replaces dead Offline status node 3beeq from Riga and Degraded status node oe52f from Hong Kong with
unassigned healthy Awaiting status node s5waw from Hong Kong4 and unassigned healthy Awaiting status node femah from Georgia without any change to decentralization.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

[LaCosta]

Proposal 135843 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

The proposal replaces one dead node along with another degraded node on subnet jtdsg:

• dead node 3beeq Dashboard Status: Active and degrade node oe52f Dashboard Status: Degraded.

with nodes:

• node s5waw Dashboard Status: Awaiting and node femah Dashboard Status: Awaiting.

There is no impact in the decentralization.

The dead node currently shows as Active but it can be seen in Node Provider Rewards that it has been having issues in the past days.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

[DRE-Team]

A new proposal with ID 136578 has been submitted, please take a look.

Click here to open proposal details

Replace a node in subnet jtdsg

Motivation:

• replacing cordoned node s5waw (freeing up nodes from Web3game in order to update ipv6)

Calculated potential impact on subnet decentralization if replacing:

• 1 additional node would result in: equal decentralization across all features

Based on the calculated potential impact, not replacing additional nodes to improve optimization.

Note: the information below is provided for your convenience. Please independently verify the decentralization changes rather than relying solely on this summary.
Here is an explaination of how decentralization is currently calculated,
and there are also instructions for performing what-if analysis if you are wondering if another node would have improved decentralization more.

Decentralization Nakamoto coefficient changes for subnet jtdsg-3h6gi-hs7o5-z2soi-43w3z-soyl3-ajnp3-ekni5-sw553-5kw67-nqe:

    node_provider: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
      data_center: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
data_center_owner: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
             area: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
          country: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)

Mean Nakamoto comparison: 5.00 → 5.00 (+0%)

Overall replacement impact: equal decentralization across all features

Details

Nodes removed:

• s5waw-pnvds-kpwqg-n6bly-r45vy-ax64x-sltbe-bbzl3-74npl-u4sos-mae [health: healthy]

Nodes added:

• l3m3j-bzfir-r3ld2-kri7q-obwcx-lix5j-7oxey-pbb6q-5tije-krocc-2qe [health: healthy]

    node_provider                                                              data_center            data_center_owner            area                        country        
    -------------                                                              -----------            -----------------            ----                        -------        
    4dibr-2alzr-h6kva-bvwn2-yqgsl-o577t-od46o-v275p-a2zov-tcw4f-eae       1    br1               1    Cloud9                  1    Brussels Capital       1    AU            1
    64xe5-tx2s3-4gjmj-pnozr-fejw2-77y5y-rhcjk-glnmx-62brf-qin5q-pqe  1 -> 0    bu1               1    Cyxtera                 1    Bucuresti              1    BE            1
    6nbcy-kprg6-ax3db-kh3cz-7jllk-oceyh-jznhs-riguq-fvk6z-6tsds-rqe       1    ct2               1    Datasite                1    Cape Town              1    CA            1
    7at4h-nhtvt-a4s55-jigss-wr2ha-ysxkn-e6w7x-7ggnm-qd3d5-ry66r-cae       1    hk4          1 -> 0    Digital Realty          1    Florida                1    CH            1
    7uioy-xitfw-yqcko-5gpya-3lpsw-dw7zt-dyyyf-wfqif-jvi76-fdbkg-cqe  0 -> 1    lj1               1    Equinix                 1    HongKong          1 -> 0    GE            1
    bvcsg-3od6r-jnydw-eysln-aql7w-td5zn-ay5m6-sibd2-jzojt-anwag-mqe       1    nd1          0 -> 1    Everyware               1    Ljubljana              1    HK       1 -> 0
    i7dto-bgkj2-xo5dx-cyrb7-zkk5y-q46eh-gz6iq-qkgyc-w4qte-scgtb-6ae       1    or1               1    M247                    1    New Delhi         0 -> 1    IN       0 -> 1
    py2kr-ipr2p-ryh66-x3a3v-5ts6u-7rfhf-alkna-ueffh-hz5ox-lt6du-qqe       1    sc1               1    Marvelous Web3 DC  0 -> 1    Ontario                1    JP            1
    rbn2y-6vfsb-gv35j-4cyvy-pzbdu-e5aum-jzjg6-5b4n5-vuguf-ycubq-zae       1    sg1               1    Megazone Cloud          1    Queensland             1    KR            1
    sixix-2nyqd-t2k2v-vlsyz-dssko-ls4hl-hyij4-y7mdp-ja6cj-nsmpf-yae       1    sl1               1    NEXTDC                  1    Seoul                  1    RO            1
    unqqg-no4b2-vbyad-ytik2-t3vly-3e57q-aje2t-sjb5l-bd4ke-chggn-uqe       1    tb1               1    Posita.si               1    Singapore              1    SG            1
    vegae-c4chr-aetfj-7gzuh-c23sx-u2paz-vmvbn-bcage-pu7lu-mptnn-eqe       1    to2               1    Telin                   1    Tbilisi                1    SI            1
    wdjjk-blh44-lxm74-ojj43-rvgf4-j5rie-nm6xs-xvnuv-j3ptn-25t4v-6ae       1    ty3               1    Teraco                  1    Tokyo                  1    US            1
    wwdbq-xuqhf-eydzu-oyl7p-ga565-zm7s7-yrive-ozgsy-zzgh3-qwb3j-cae       1    zh2               1    hkntt              1 -> 0    Zurich                 1    ZA            1

[Lorimer]

Proposal 136578 Review | Lorimer - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: NO

TLDR: The proposal does not provide reference to sufficient evidence in order to verify/confirm its claim.

@Lorimer

This is a requirement that has been brought up as necessary time and again. I do not wish for proposals like this to continue being normalised. Nudging nodes in and out of subnets is an operation that carries significant security implications, and all the supporting evidence/justification for the swap should be provided in the proposal summary (it’s not something voters should be expected to have to hunt for).

Country Discrepancies (1)

@Lorimer

@alexu, can I ask where RIPE Atlas locates this node? I’ve not yet set myself up on the network, so don’t have any credits in order to check. I also noticed that my prior checks on an earlier discussion using ipinfo.io may have been inaccurate simply due to a stale local cache that I was using. I’ve just cleared it out and these are the results I’m getting for this node at the moment. Curious to see how that matches up with what you get.

Node	Data Center	Claimed Country	According to ipinfo.io
dsnjt	Toronto 2	Canada	United States of America (the)

Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

	Smallest Distance	Average Distance	Largest Distance
EXISTING	478.364 km	8469.976 km	16654.257 km
PROPOSED	478.364 km	8341.853 km (-1.5%)	16654.257 km

This proposal slightly reduces decentralisation, considered purely in terms of geographic distance (and therefore there’s a slight theoretical reduction in localised disaster resilience).

Subnet characteristic counts →

	Continents	Countries	Data Centers	Owners	Node Providers	Node Operator
EXISTING	5	13	13	13	13	13
PROPOSED	5	13	13	13	13	13

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

	Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
EXISTING	5	1	1	1	1	1
PROPOSED	5	1	1	1	1	1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 135700

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description

• Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)

• Green marker represents an added node

• Blue marker represents an unchanged node

• Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

• Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

• Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to ipinfo.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.

Node Changes

Action	Node	Status		Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
Remove	s5waw	UP		Asia	Hong Kong	HongKong 4 (hk4)	hkntt	Web3game	dg7of
Add	l3m3j	UNASSIGNED		Asia	India	New Delhi 1 (nd1)	Marvelous Web3 DC	Marvelous Web3	ri4lg

Other Nodes

Node	Status		Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
4y5k6	UP		Oceania	Australia	Queensland 1 (sc1)	NEXTDC	Karel Frank	f3toa
rphlf	UP		Europe	Belgium	Brussels (br1)	Digital Realty	Allusion	mjeqs
dsnjt	UP		North America	Canada	Toronto 2 (to2)	Cyxtera	Blockchain Development Labs	4lp6i
gtc2a	UP		Europe	Switzerland	Zurich 2 (zh2)	Everyware	DFINITY Stiftung	vqe65
femah	UP		Asia	Georgia	Tbilisi 1 (tb1)	Cloud9	George Bassadone	yhfy4
nioyi	UP		Asia	Japan	Tokyo 3 (ty3)	Equinix	Starbase	a5glg
vt5q3	UP		Asia	Korea (the Republic of)	Seoul 1 (sl1)	Megazone Cloud	Neptune Partners	ukji3
pym4f	UP		Europe	Romania	Bucharest (bu1)	M247	Iancu Aurel	c5ssg
tjg3r	UP		Asia	Singapore	Singapore (sg1)	Telin	OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital	d4bin
i5kts	UP		Europe	Slovenia	Ljubljana (lj1)	Posita.si	Fractal Labs AG	gl27f
ifjiy	UP		North America	United States of America (the)	Orlando (or1)	Datasite	Giant Leaf, LLC	2rqo7
4c63m	UP		Africa	South Africa	Cape Town 2 (ct2)	Teraco	Kontrapunt (Pty) Ltd	x7fjr

---

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

---

Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

[timk11]

Proposal 136578 | Tim - CodeGov

Vote: Adopt

This proposal replaces 1 node in subnet jtdsg, appearing in the decentralization tool as “UP”, at the request of its node provider (Web3game). As shown in the proposal, decentralisation parameters are unchanged and remain within the requirements of the target topology.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neurons’ Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralisation of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

[aligatorr89]

Proposal 136578 Review | aligatorr - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Replaces node from Web3game, they are doing an upgrade on their infra.

• Proposed topology Nakamoto Coefficient stayed the same as on current topology.

Node Changes 1 removed, 1 added

Node ID	Status	Country	City	Node Provider	Data Center	Data Center Owner
s5waw-pnvds-kpwqg-n6bly-r45vy-ax64x-sltbe-bbzl3-74npl-u4sos-mae → l3m3j-bzfir-r3ld2-kri7q-obwcx-lix5j-7oxey-pbb6q-5tije-krocc-2qe	UP → UNASSIGNED	HK → IN	HongKong → New Delhi	Web3game → Marvelous Web3	hk4 → nd1	hkntt → Marvelous Web3 DC

Current Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00

Attribute	Nakamoto Coefficient	Identical attribute values	Max allowed identical values	Unique Counts
Country	5		3	13
City	5		1	13
Data Center	5		1	13
Data Center Owner	5		1	13
Node Provider ID	5		1	13

Proposed Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00

Attribute	Nakamoto Coefficient	Identical attribute values	Max allowed identical values	Unique Counts
Country	5		3	13
City	5		1	13
Data Center	5		1	13
Data Center Owner	5		1	13
Node Provider ID	5		1	13

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals.
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals.
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

[MalithHatananchchige]

Proposal 136578 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR:
The proposal replaces node in subnet x33ed… (application). As claimed by NP they will be undergoing IPv4 and IPv6 change, decentralisation stats remain the same. Vote to adopt.

Subnet Details

Property	Value
ID	jtdsg…
Type	application
Memory Usage	253.33 GB
Running Canisters	27331
Description	N/A

Provider Changes

Removed	Added
Web3game	Marvelous Web3

Location Changes

Removed	Added
Asia, HongKong 4	Asia, New Delhi 1

Nodes Removed 1

Node ID	Status	Provider	Data Center	Location
s5waw…	UP	Web3game	hk4	HongKong 4

Nodes Added 1

Node ID	Status	Provider	Data Center	Location
l3m3j…	UNASSIGNED	Marvelous Web3	nd1	New Delhi 1

Passes:

Node s5waw…: Remove from Subnet check passed.
Node l3m3j…: Replacement Status check passed.

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

[LaCosta]

Proposal 136578 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

The proposal replaces a cordoned node on subnet jtdsg:

• removes cordoned node s5waw Dashboard Status: Active.
• adds node l3m3j Dashboard Status: Awaiting.

There is no impact in the decentralization metrics.

As explained in this post and verified by the NP here the cordoned node is being removed in order to redeploy it due to getting new IPv4 and IPv6 ranges.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

[ZackDS]

Proposal #136578 — Zack | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted

Reason:
The proposal replaces cordoned node s5waw (freeing up nodes from Web3game in order to update ipv6).

OBS: meanwhile the NP is asking for the proposals to be rejected. “there will be no need to change IPv4 and IPv6”.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.