May: Summary at 2025-05-24 09:19 UTC
See this post and following discussion for context.
Degraded or Down Nodes
- 3hhby: 1 (4 more would stall the subnet)
- 5kdm2: 1 (4 more would stall the subnet)
- bkfrj: 1 (4 more would stall the subnet)
- e66qm: 1 (4 more would stall the subnet)
- k44fs: 1 (4 more would stall the subnet)
- nl6hn: 1 (4 more would stall the subnet)
- pzp6e: 2 (10 more would stall the subnet)
- tdb26: 1 (13 more would stall the subnet)
- uzr34: 1 (11 more would stall the subnet)
- w4asl: 1 (4 more would stall the subnet)
- w4rem: 1 (4 more would stall the subnet)
- x33ed: 1 (11 more would stall the subnet)
Summary Grouped by Node Provider
- Lukas Helebrandt: 6 out of 6 assigned nodes are degraded or offline (100%)
- 3yok3-yvswm-l4ior-bjh62-fsi73-vfqp3-77wji-coglq-l2bjw-rxrph-uqe DOWN
- afu64-x2met-w2vxb-4lzus-z4fhf-divej-q46gf-wvpek-dj67h-fptsd-aae DOWN
- b44r4-u77ay-myhhv-d6d75-jusik-b7ry2-g6ms5-6okxm-tumyx-rjm4g-4ae DOWN
- izmdg-yz3l4-jp5vr-rva2j-5btpc-bzgt5-7snt4-wwy2g-jaq7v-rzpsv-oae DOWN
- lilkb-wf7hu-iv6gp-gbbv6-f6bpj-amtp5-v2jyi-3s7jw-6dysi-yzm4g-hae DOWN
- mae7q-ggnbj-xb52f-hvest-dgqoc-whvsq-yui5d-5cys2-zeold-l5ydx-oae DOWN
- 3yok3-yvswm-l4ior-bjh62-fsi73-vfqp3-77wji-coglq-l2bjw-rxrph-uqe DOWN
- Zarety LLC: 4 out of 4 assigned nodes are degraded or offline (100%)
- ACCUSET SOLUTIONS: 3 out of 6 assigned nodes are degraded or offline (50%)
Online/Offline (Up/Down) & Assigned/Unassigned Analysis
Unassigned nodes up < Assigned nodes up
The below is a list of node providers who have fewer unassigned nodes online than they have assigned nodes online (ignoring node providers who have 0 unassigned nodes). Assuming this snapshot is representative, their rewards will overestimate their contribution to resource availability (due to extrapolation described by motion 135054).
Node Provider | Assigned | Unassigned | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Privoxy Solutions, LLC | 1 100% are up | 2 50% are up | 3 67% are up |
Maksym Ishchenko | 6 100% are up | 1 0% are up | 7 86% are up |
Bohatyrov Volodymyr | 5 100% are up | 2 50% are up | 7 86% are up |
Anonstake | 14 100% are up | 2 50% are up | 16 94% are up |
Starbase | 19 100% are up | 22 91% are up | 41 95% are up |
87m Neuron, LLC | 17 100% are up | 24 92% are up | 41 95% are up |
Virtual Hive Ltd | 18 100% are up | 9 89% are up | 27 96% are up |
BlockTech Ventures, LLC | 1 100% are up | 26 96% are up | 27 96% are up |
Fractal Labs AG | 30 100% are up | 26 92% are up | 56 96% are up |
Bigger Capital | 2 100% are up | 26 96% are up | 28 96% are up |
Extragone SA | 16 100% are up | 25 96% are up | 41 98% are up |
DFINITY Stiftung | 39 100% are up | 31 97% are up | 70 99% are up |
Unassigned nodes up > Assigned nodes up
The below is a list of node providers who have more unassigned nodes online than they have assigned nodes online (including node providers who have 0 assigned nodes). Assuming this snapshot is representative, their rewards will underestimate their contribution to resource availability (due to extrapolation described by motion 135054).
Node Provider | Assigned | Unassigned | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Zarety LLC | 4 0% are up | 38 5% are up | 42 5% are up |
InfoObjects | 0 0% are up | 4 50% are up | 4 50% are up |
Zondax AG | 0 0% are up | 2 50% are up | 2 50% are up |
ACCUSET SOLUTIONS | 6 50% are up | 4 100% are up | 10 70% are up |
100 Count Holdings, LLC | 0 0% are up | 28 96% are up | 28 96% are up |
NODAO | 0 0% are up | 28 100% are up | 28 100% are up |
DeNoDe | 0 0% are up | 14 100% are up | 14 100% are up |
Uvaca Labs LLC | 0 0% are up | 28 100% are up | 28 100% are up |
Reist Telecom AG | 0 0% are up | 28 100% are up | 28 100% are up |
Protocol16 | 0 0% are up | 28 100% are up | 28 100% are up |
Decentralized Entities Foundation | 0 0% are up | 14 100% are up | 14 100% are up |
Arceau NP LLC | 0 0% are up | 28 100% are up | 28 100% are up |
Aksinia Stavskaya | 0 0% are up | 28 100% are up | 28 100% are up |
NoviSystems, LLC | 0 0% are up | 3 100% are up | 3 100% are up |
0X52 | 0 0% are up | 27 100% are up | 27 100% are up |