Subnet Management - eq6en (Application)

Proposal 134546

TLDR: To be continued…

Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

Smallest Distance Average Distance Largest Distance
EXISTING 0 km 6967.167 km 14817.958 km
PROPOSED 0 km 6967.167 km 14817.958 km

Subnet characteristic counts →

Continents Countries Data Centers Owners Node Providers Node Operator
EXISTING 3 11 13 13 13 13
PROPOSED 3 11 13 13 13 13

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
EXISTING 6 2 1 1 1 1
PROPOSED 6 2 1 1 1 1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 132136

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description
  • Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)
  • Green marker represents an added node
  • Blue marker represents an unchanged node
  • Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)
  • Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

Node Changes
Action Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
Remove rg3ny UP :bar_chart: Europe Belgium Antwerp (an1) Datacenter United Allusion pgunx
Remove 2vmqi UP :bar_chart: Asia Japan Tokyo 2 (ty2) Equinix Starbase dpt4y
Add 6fm36 UNASSIGNED :bar_chart: Europe Belgium Brussels 2 (br2) AtlasEdge Allusion oorkg
Add bz4m4 UNASSIGNED :bar_chart: Asia Japan Tokyo (ty1) Equinix Starbase cqjev
Other Nodes
Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
ijend UP :bar_chart: Europe Belgium Seoul 3 (kr1) KT Pindar Technology Limited iubpe
tliwu UP :bar_chart: Americas Canada Toronto (to1) Cyxtera Blockchain Development Labs 6oxlv
ew5us UP :bar_chart: Europe Switzerland Geneva (ge1) HighDC Archery Blockchain SCSp yngfj
s5waw UP :bar_chart: Asia China HongKong 4 (hk4) hkntt Web3game dg7of
mlbpy UP :bar_chart: Asia India New Delhi 1 (nd1) Marvelous Web3 DC Marvelous Web3 ri4lg
u5ycx UP :bar_chart: Europe Lithuania Vilnius 1 (bt1) Baltneta Maksym Ishchenko xr5zy
nhkbm UP :bar_chart: Asia Singapore Singapore (sg1) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital d4bin
2lhun UP :bar_chart: Europe Slovenia Ljubljana (lj1) Posita.si Fractal Labs AG gl27f
wvxfb UP :bar_chart: Europe Sweden Stockholm 1 (sh1) Digital Realty DFINITY Stiftung lgp6d
dkx5h UP :bar_chart: Americas United States of America (the) Orlando (or1) Datasite Giant Leaf, LLC redpf
7qvtt UP :bar_chart: Americas United States of America (the) Phoenix (ph1) CyrusOne MI Servers 5bnm2

*This comment references the latest comment in the Subnet Management - General Discussion thread only to generate an automated cross-link from the general thread (to improve topic navigation).


You may wish to follow D-QUORUM if you found this analysis helpful.

Known Neurons to follow if you're too busy to keep on top of things like this

If you found this analysis helpful and would like to follow the vote of the LORIMER known neuron in the future, consider configuring LORIMER as a followee for the Subnet Management topic.

Additional good neurons to follow:

  • D-QUORUM (a highly decentralized neuron that follows neurons that have been elected by the NNS)
  • Synapse (currently follows the LORIMER and CodeGov known neurons for Subnet Management, and is a generally well informed known neuron to follow on numerous other topics)
  • CodeGov (actively reviews and votes on Subnet Management proposals, and is well informed on numerous other technical topics)
  • WaterNeuron (the WaterNeuron DAO frequently discuss proposals like this in order to vote responsibly based on DAO consensus)

Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.