Subnet Management - 2fq7c (Application)

[Lorimer]

Proposal 135412 Review | Lorimer - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Replaces 1 dead node with an unassigned node. IC Target Topology metrics remain unchanged
.
The country discrepancy is a interesting case, but that involves a node that isn’t affected by this proposal (something to revisit)

Country Discrepancies (1)

Node	Data Center	Claimed Country	According to ipinfo.io
2grd6	Toronto 2	Canada	United States of America (the)

Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

	Smallest Distance	Average Distance	Largest Distance
EXISTING	543.415 km	9054.718 km	18504.433 km
PROPOSED	543.415 km	8887.568 km (-1.8%)	18504.433 km

This proposal slightly reduces decentralisation, considered purely in terms of geographic distance (and therefore there’s a slight theoretical reduction in localised disaster resilience).

Subnet characteristic counts →

	Continents	Countries	Data Centers	Owners	Node Providers	Node Operator
EXISTING	5	13	13	13	13	13
PROPOSED	5	13	13	13	13	13

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

	Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
EXISTING	5	1	1	1	1	1
PROPOSED	4 (-20%)	1	1	1	1	1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 132136

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description

• Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)

• Green marker represents an added node

• Blue marker represents an unchanged node

• Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

• Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

• Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to ipinfo.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.

Node Changes

Action	Node	Status		Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
Remove	jux3z	DOWN		Asia	Hong Kong	HongKong 4 (hk4)	hkntt	Web3game	dg7of
Add	m34r6	UNASSIGNED		Europe	Romania	Bucharest (bu1)	M247	Iancu Aurel	c5ssg

Other Nodes

Node	Status		Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
6wnv3	UP		Oceania	Australia	Queensland 1 (sc1)	NEXTDC	ANYPOINT PTY LTD	srrm2
2grd6	UP		North America	Canada	Toronto 2 (to2)	Cyxtera	Blockchain Development Labs	4lp6i
vudfj	UP		Europe	Switzerland	Zurich 6 (zh6)	Green.ch	Sygnum Bank	ciprs
aqbno	UP		North America	Costa Rica	San José 1 (cr1)	Navegalo	GeoNodes LLC	eqv2i
fh6lp	UP		Asia	India	Panvel 2 (pl2)	Yotta	Krishna Enterprises	7rw6b
asad5	UP		Asia	Japan	Tokyo (ty1)	Equinix	Starbase	cqjev
wgigf	UP		Asia	Korea (the Republic of)	Seoul 3 (kr1)	KT	Pindar Technology Limited	iubpe
ptzzn	UP		Europe	Sweden	Stockholm 1 (sh1)	Digital Realty	DFINITY Stiftung	lgp6d
ux7wu	UP		Asia	Singapore	Singapore 2 (sg2)	Telin	OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital	qffmn
zxxo4	UP		Europe	Slovenia	Maribor (mb1)	Posita.si	Fractal Labs AG	3xiew
buqsd	UP		North America	United States of America (the)	Sterling (st1)	CyrusOne	MI Servers	tcn4t
jys4w	UP		Africa	South Africa	Gauteng 3 (jb3)	Xneelo	Wolkboer (Pty) Ltd	ymenq

---

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron (coming soon) if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

---

Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

[timk11]

Proposal 135412 | Tim - CodeGov

Vote: Adopt

This proposal replaces 1 node in subnet 2fq7c, appearing in the decentralization tool as “DOWN”. As shown in the proposal, decentralisation parameters are unchanged and remain within the requirements of the target topology.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neurons’ Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralisation of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

[ZackDS]

Proposal #135412 — Zack | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted
Reason:
The proposal replaces dead Offline status node jux3z from the HK4 DC in Hong Kong, with unassigned healthy Awaiting status node m34r6 from Bucharest without any change to decentralization.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

[aligatorr89]

Proposal 135412 Review | aligatorr - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Replaces problematic node with a healthy one.

• Proposed topology Nakamoto Coefficient stayed the same as on current topology.

Node Changes 1 removed, 1 added

Node ID	Status	Country	City	Node Provider	Data Center	Data Center Owner
jux3z-ivwyz-ury64-jth4b-rrbfi-sx5af-ci72l-j4ot3-nl5jk-z4ilu-6qe → m34r6-l2rj7-deohw-yrkjp-sretm-6tadf-xnwqy-3flhm-nqj4r-wwcoh-eae	DOWN → UNASSIGNED	HK → RO	HongKong → Bucuresti	Web3game → Iancu Aurel	hk4 → bu1	hkntt → M247

Current Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00

Attribute	Nakamoto Coefficient	Identical attribute values	Max allowed identical values	Unique Counts
Country	5	1	2	13
City	5	1	1	13
Data Center	5	1	1	13
Data Center Owner	5	1	1	13
Node Provider ID	5	1	1	13

Proposed Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00

Attribute	Nakamoto Coefficient	Identical attribute values	Max allowed identical values	Unique Counts
Country	5	1	2	13
City	5	1	1	13
Data Center	5	1	1	13
Data Center Owner	5	1	1	13
Node Provider ID	5	1	1	13

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals.
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals.
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

[MalithHatananchchige]

Proposal 135412 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: Yes

TLDR:

Replacing one offline node in HongKong Asia. Proposed decentralization stats remain the same.

Warning

Proposed DC Bucharest seems to be congested with more than 80% of nodes on subnet, It would be good if the @DRE-Team could distribute future offline nodes to other DC with similar decentralization stats. However, I vote to ADOPT

Provider Changes

Removed	Added
Web3game	Iancu Aurel

Location Changes

Removed	Added
Asia, HongKong 4	Europe, Bucharest

Nodes Removed 1

Node ID	Status	Provider	Data Center	Location
jux3z…	DOWN	Web3game	hk4	HongKong 4

Nodes Added 1

Node ID	Status	Provider	Data Center	Location
m34r6…	UNASSIGNED	Iancu Aurel	bu1	Bucharest

Passes:

Node jux3z…: Health check passed.

Node jux3z…: Remove from Subnet check passed.

Node m34r6…: Replacement Status check passed.

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals

• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals

• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

[LaCosta]

Proposal 135412 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

The proposal replaces a dead nodes on subnet 2fq7c:
dead node jux3z Dashboard Status: Active with node m34r6 Dashboard Status: Awaiting

Although at the time of this post the node shows in the dashboard as Active, it can be seen through the Node Provider Rewards that this node as been having inconsistent behaviour through the past 5 days.

There is no impact in the overall decentralization across all features.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

[DRE-Team]

A new proposal with ID 135990 has been submitted, please take a look.

Click here to open proposal details

Replace a node in subnet 2fq7c

Motivation:

• replacing jys4w-lodfn-h5325-xters-z3hf2-v7imc-ow7dh-py22m-epjvt-aldwt-oqe as it is unhealthy: Dead
• replacing : Replacement of jys4w requested by the node operator in order to redeploy this node following the replacement of a faulty disk. You're invited to talk on Matrix

NOTE: The information below is provided for your convenience. Please independently verify the decentralization changes rather than relying solely on this summary.
Code for calculating replacements is at dre/rs/decentralization/src/network.rs at 79066127f58c852eaf4adda11610e815a426878c · dfinity/dre · GitHub

Decentralization Nakamoto coefficient changes for subnet 2fq7c-slacv-26cgz-vzbx2-2jrcs-5edph-i5s2j-tck77-c3rlz-iobzx-mqe:

    node_provider: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
      data_center: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
data_center_owner: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
             area: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
          country: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)

Mean Nakamoto comparison: 5.00 → 5.00 (+0%)

Overall replacement impact: equal decentralization across all features

Details

Nodes removed:

• jys4w-lodfn-h5325-xters-z3hf2-v7imc-ow7dh-py22m-epjvt-aldwt-oqe [health: dead]

Nodes added:

• gsvxv-tou7p-drlxw-rnldp-m7z3n-e42j4-nrsp4-dzsfc-7wuqr-2qwpf-pae [health: healthy]

    node_provider                                                              data_center            data_center_owner            area                  country        
    -------------                                                              -----------            -----------------            ----                  -------        
    6nbcy-kprg6-ax3db-kh3cz-7jllk-oceyh-jznhs-riguq-fvk6z-6tsds-rqe       1    bu1               1    CyrusOne                1    Bucuresti        1    AU            1
    6r5lw-l7db7-uwixn-iw5en-yy55y-ilbtq-e6gcv-g22r2-j3g6q-y37jk-jqe       1    cr1               1    Cyxtera                 1    Gauteng     1 -> 0    CA            1
    6sq7t-knkul-fko6h-xzvnf-ktbvr-jhx7r-hapzr-kjlek-whugy-zt6ip-xqe       1    hk1          0 -> 1    Digital Realty          1    HongKong    0 -> 1    CH            1
    7at4h-nhtvt-a4s55-jigss-wr2ha-ysxkn-e6w7x-7ggnm-qd3d5-ry66r-cae       1    jb3          1 -> 0    Equinix                 1    Maribor          1    CR            1
    bvcsg-3od6r-jnydw-eysln-aql7w-td5zn-ay5m6-sibd2-jzojt-anwag-mqe       1    kr1               1    Green.ch                1    Ontario          1    HK       0 -> 1
    fwnmn-zn7yt-5jaia-fkxlr-dzwyu-keguq-npfxq-mc72w-exeae-n5thj-oae       1    mb1               1    KT                      1    Panvel           1    IN            1
    g2ax6-jrkmb-3zuh3-jibtb-q5xoq-njrgo-5utbc-j2o7g-zfq2w-yyhky-dqe  0 -> 1    pl2               1    M247                    1    Queensland       1    JP            1
    i7dto-bgkj2-xo5dx-cyrb7-zkk5y-q46eh-gz6iq-qkgyc-w4qte-scgtb-6ae       1    sc1               1    NEXTDC                  1    San Jose         1    KR            1
    izmhk-lpjum-uo4oy-lviba-yctpc-arg4b-2ywim-vgoiu-gqaj2-gskmw-2qe       1    sg2               1    Navegalo                1    Seoul            1    RO            1
    mme7u-zxs3z-jq3un-fbaly-nllcz-toct2-l2kp3-larrb-gti4r-u2bmo-dae  1 -> 0    sh1               1    Posita.si               1    Singapore        1    SE            1
    r3yjn-kthmg-pfgmb-2fngg-5c7d7-t6kqg-wi37r-j7gy6-iee64-kjdja-jae       1    st1               1    Telin                   1    Stockholm        1    SG            1
    sixix-2nyqd-t2k2v-vlsyz-dssko-ls4hl-hyij4-y7mdp-ja6cj-nsmpf-yae       1    to2               1    Unicom             0 -> 1    Tokyo            1    SI            1
    wdjjk-blh44-lxm74-ojj43-rvgf4-j5rie-nm6xs-xvnuv-j3ptn-25t4v-6ae       1    ty1               1    Xneelo             1 -> 0    Virginia         1    US            1
    zy4m7-z5mhs-zfkpl-zlsjl-blrbx-mvvmq-5z4zu-mf7eq-hhv7o-ezfro-3ae       1    zh6               1    Yotta                   1    Zurich           1    ZA       1 -> 0

[aligatorr89]

Proposal 135990 Review | aligatorr - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Replaces unhealthy node.

• Proposed topology Nakamoto Coefficient stayed the same as on current topology.

Node Changes 1 removed, 1 added

Node ID	Status	Country	City	Node Provider	Data Center	Data Center Owner
jys4w-lodfn-h5325-xters-z3hf2-v7imc-ow7dh-py22m-epjvt-aldwt-oqe → gsvxv-tou7p-drlxw-rnldp-m7z3n-e42j4-nrsp4-dzsfc-7wuqr-2qwpf-pae	DOWN → UNASSIGNED	ZA → HK	Gauteng → HongKong	Wolkboer (Pty) Ltd → Wancloud limited	jb3 → hk1	Xneelo → Unicom

Current Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00

Attribute	Nakamoto Coefficient	Identical attribute values	Max allowed identical values	Unique Counts
Country	5		3	13
City	5		1	13
Data Center	5		1	13
Data Center Owner	5		1	13
Node Provider ID	5		1	13

Proposed Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00

Attribute	Nakamoto Coefficient	Identical attribute values	Max allowed identical values	Unique Counts
Country	5		3	13
City	5		1	13
Data Center	5		1	13
Data Center Owner	5		1	13
Node Provider ID	5		1	13

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals.
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals.
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

[LaCosta]

Proposal 135990 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

The proposal replaces a dead nodes on subnet 2fq7c:
dead node jys4w Dashboard Status: Offline with node gsvxv Dashboard Status: Awaiting.

The proposal was requested by the Node Operator on matrix in order to redeploy the node after having replaced a faulty disk.

There is no impact in the overall decentralization across all features.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

[Lorimer]

Proposal 135990 Review | Lorimer - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Offline node replaced by unassigned node. There’s a slight reduction in the average distance between nodes, as well as continent diversity, but the formal IC Target Topology isn’t impacted.

The proposal summary also links to discussion with the node operator which is useful.

Country Discrepancies (1)

Hi @Gabriel_Rodriguez, could you clarify/confirm the location of this node please?

Node	Data Center	Claimed Country	According to ipinfo.io
2grd6	Toronto 2	Canada	United States of America (the)

Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

	Smallest Distance	Average Distance	Largest Distance
EXISTING	543.415 km	8887.568 km	18504.433 km
PROPOSED	543.415 km	8483.401 km (-4.5%)	18504.433 km

This proposal slightly reduces decentralisation, considered purely in terms of geographic distance (and therefore there’s a slight theoretical reduction in localised disaster resilience).

Subnet characteristic counts →

	Continents	Countries	Data Centers	Owners	Node Providers	Node Operator
EXISTING	5	13	13	13	13	13
PROPOSED	4 (-25%)	13	13	13	13	13

This proposal slightly reduces decentralisation in terms of jurisdiction diversity.

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

	Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
EXISTING	4	1	1	1	1	1
PROPOSED	5 (+25%)	1	1	1	1	1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 135700

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description

• Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)

• Green marker represents an added node

• Blue marker represents an unchanged node

• Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

• Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

• Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to ipinfo.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.

Node Changes

Action	Node	Status		Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
Remove	jys4w	DOWN		Africa	South Africa	Gauteng 3 (jb3)	Xneelo	Wolkboer (Pty) Ltd	ymenq
Add	gsvxv	UNASSIGNED		Asia	Hong Kong	HongKong 1 (hk1)	Unicom	Wancloud limited	z6cfb

Other Nodes

Node	Status		Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
6wnv3	UP		Oceania	Australia	Queensland 1 (sc1)	NEXTDC	ANYPOINT PTY LTD	srrm2
2grd6	UP		North America	Canada	Toronto 2 (to2)	Cyxtera	Blockchain Development Labs	4lp6i
vudfj	UP		Europe	Switzerland	Zurich 6 (zh6)	Green.ch	Sygnum Bank	ciprs
aqbno	UP		North America	Costa Rica	San José 1 (cr1)	Navegalo	GeoNodes LLC	eqv2i
fh6lp	UP		Asia	India	Panvel 2 (pl2)	Yotta	Krishna Enterprises	7rw6b
asad5	UP		Asia	Japan	Tokyo (ty1)	Equinix	Starbase	cqjev
wgigf	UP		Asia	Korea (the Republic of)	Seoul 3 (kr1)	KT	Pindar Technology Limited	iubpe
m34r6	UP		Europe	Romania	Bucharest (bu1)	M247	Iancu Aurel	c5ssg
ptzzn	UP		Europe	Sweden	Stockholm 1 (sh1)	Digital Realty	DFINITY Stiftung	lgp6d
ux7wu	UP		Asia	Singapore	Singapore 2 (sg2)	Telin	OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital	qffmn
zxxo4	UP		Europe	Slovenia	Maribor (mb1)	Posita.si	Fractal Labs AG	3xiew
buqsd	UP		North America	United States of America (the)	Sterling (st1)	CyrusOne	MI Servers	tcn4t

---

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

---

Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

[MalithHatananchchige]

Proposal 135990 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR:
The proposal replaces a offline node Gauteng. No issues were found in the nodes or locations proposed and decentralization stats remain the same. I vote to adopt

Provider Changes

Removed	Added
Wolkboer (Pty) Ltd	Wancloud limited

Location Changes

Removed	Added
Africa, Gauteng 3	Asia, HongKong 1

Nodes Removed 1

Node ID	Status	Provider	Data Center	Location
jys4w…	DOWN	Wolkboer (Pty) Ltd	jb3	Gauteng 3

Nodes Added 1

Node ID	Status	Provider	Data Center	Location
gsvxv…	UNASSIGNED	Wancloud limited	hk1	HongKong 1

Passes:

Node jys4w…: Health check passed.
Node jys4w…: Remove from Subnet check passed.
Node gsvxv…: Replacement Status check passed.

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

[timk11]

Proposal 135990 | Tim - CodeGov

Vote: Adopt

This proposal replaces 1 node in subnet 2fq7c, appearing in the decentralization tool as “DOWN”. As shown in the proposal, decentralisation parameters are unchanged and remain within the requirements of the target topology.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neurons’ Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralisation of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

[ZackDS]

Proposal #135990 — Zack | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted

Reason: The proposal replaces dead Offline status node jys4w from Soth Africa with unassigned healthy Awaiting status node gsvxv from Hong Kong without any change to decentralization. The included link from the NP is helpful.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.