thanks for the feedback!
Would love to hear what others think on 1 & 2. One concern I have for proposal 1 is that it is already rather hard for new voters to understand the catch-all. Critical proposals are yet another concept. So I think it would be easier if the catch-all just applies to all non-critical proposals as then it is one concept less that people have to understand (it is just on set of voting rules for critical and one set of rules for non-critical proposals and the catch-all can be renamed a s such).
It is very cumbersome to set Followees for the Critical proposals. Please create an All Critical Proposals catch all category.
Note that with this new proposal there would only be 2 topics that are critical and following would now be set on a topic basis.
Again I wonder if it is more helping or confusing if we introduce another “level” which is overarching different topics. IMH if it is just about 2/3 topics it can makse sense to keep them separate as the work is manageable but we may have more the effect that people make good and distinct decisions for the different topics.
the NNS dApp should clearly identify all critical proposal topics and outline how they are different than non-critical proposals.
thanks for the feedback. We are already thinking about how to make setting following easier on the NNS dapp. I would though not attach this to this feature but rather the initiative where we improve following on the FE as I think this belongs more to the user story of how we can improve this (what is already there as well as the new features)