This is an interesting stance. Are you able to show your workings? Governance overreach is the current status quo. Just look at the follower-inclusive-VP of the most powerful neuron or two on any SNS.
Could you explain this further? Neurons are designed to be capable of having no explicit controller (‘community-controlled’) and there are also already many cross-SNS DAO-controlled neurons.
Why would that be the case? In any case, do you prefer this priviledge resting in the hands of an individual?
Yes. That’s not where we are, and if you track the stats, it’s not even where we’re going.
There’s no way a neuron like D-QUORUM would lead to worse centralisation than we have now. It distributes consentually delegated VP equally among established neurons.
Have you ever looked at a graph of the distribution of follower-based-VP? Would you like me to show you, in addition to showing you results after simulating the presence of a functional D-QUORUM neuron (under pessimistic, conservative and optimistic conditions)?