Addressing those who Alex tagged: I’m just looking for feedback from people with the necessary knowledge to confirm or change my thesis on this proposal. The post has been merely structured using the LLM based on my own interpretation and input. I would appreciate any kind of feedback on my doubts.
Unrelated
Now Alex, I try to remain objective and on topic and you have done nothing but continued to roll back with personal attacks. I don’t need your drawings to understand things, I’m not in kindergarden.
Yes, I do use LLMs, both for gathering information and polishing my writing. I use LLMs to format the text in a more polished version than my dyslexic input. For your information I’ve spent around 12+ hours to document myself on this proposal and I asked politely to be corrected if something was misunderstood. You see, even though I use LLMs, I also look for confirmation from knowledgeable people on things I might lack before drawing my conclusions. You have done nothing in this regard, yet you have dedicated quite the effort to make me look bad or like some kind of impostor. Congratulations, that really says a lot.
I work with CodeGov, yes, but first of all I’ve been an ICP investor since 2021 and have done countless hours of research. I don’t need your data, I’m very aware of the situation. Clearly it is you who doesn’t understand what I mean when I say I want VP to be decentralised. Would you like me to make a drawing for you? Your proposal impacts MY investment, i’m doing my due diligence on MY investment and your only argumentation for now has been that I work with CodeGov, hence I’m biased.
Your D-Quorum neuron makes governance redundant and that’s a fact. You want people to vote for a council that votes for proposals that people can already vote on or delegate to others. Your problem is with the fact that the majority of neurons controlling NNS and SNS are managed in a centralized manner, and I see no problem in that. Neurons can be individuals or they can be collectives that manage them as they please. Contributing to a decentralized environment does not mean that everyone has to do it in a decentralized way, otherwise Dfinity itself should be under the control of the NNS. You want a DAO controlled neuron to counteract? It’s great, do it, I praised your effort, but putting it under the control of the same DAO it contributes to is pointless. SNS projects are not TAGGR that has no following mechanisms where it would make sense to have a DAO governed council that acts in the name of the DAO. SNS projects already have those councils, and it’s thanks to people having the ability to follow whoever they feel represented by the most. I guarantee you that those asking for the dev neuron do so for a specific reason, being stupid as you called them is not it. Congrats on that line as well btw.
On a side note, if CodeGov secured those grants is because it has a multi-year track record of being a reliable entity in the ICP ecosystem. You were part of CodeGov as well, you took those grants too for the record, besides getting one for yourself. I had a lot of respect for you Alex, your technical skills are not up for debate. You lost it the moment I came up with a couple of arguments that do not align with yours. I tried to remain on topic and to distance myself from your personal problems with CodeGov, you have done nothing but dragging me in. I’m done talking to you, you clearly can not help me understand the benefits of your proposal for me to make an informed decision.
This has been really unrelated, and frankly quite unnecessary.