Cris, your arguments have been LLM-generated. Please understand that it’s unreasonable to debate by clicking a button while demanding a significantly larger time investment from the reader/responder (unless they’re to resort to the same approach - which gets old fast). This isn’t how reasonable debates are conducted.
100% fake
This AI detection certificate is valid for 3 days, for anyone who would like to inspect. Alternatively you can perform the analysis yourself, using this tool or a number of others.
Having been a member, I’m aware that CodeGov makes excessive use of LLMs in marketing content (and evidently elsewhere). I know that you represent the marketing arm of CodeGov, but when it comes to debating on important topics, I find this approach counter-productive to reasonable debate. It’s ridiculously easy to spam a topic with AI fluff. If you’re going to insist on doing this, can I ask that you label your content as such? It’s largely the same on OC.
Users place trust in CodeGov, and I think they deserve a higher standard of practise (in more ways than one). I don’t mean this to offend. It’s a polite request.
I’ll pick apart and address each of those LLM-generated points when I get a chance later. Many of them are founded on misconceptions, and a lack of understanding (which is fair, it a complicated topic, and LLMs are great at providing shallow but convincing sounding arguments in your favour, if you ask them to).
In the meantime I’ve prepared an infographic that I hope makes things clearer.
As a side note, while you’ve mentioned you’re keen to distance yourself from your position in CodeGov for the sake of this debate, I think it’s very important to acknowledge. Both you and @wpb are the only individuals who have objected to this idea. As it happens CodeGov represents Neuron A in the infographic above. Your arguments have been that you want to see VP decentralised and shared among many. You clearly do not realise what the reality of the situation is. Would you like me to show you some real data?
In terms of seeking feedback from others, I’ve only very recently broached this topic, and I decided to start with WaterNeuron given it’s governance importance for the NNS. I think it would be useful to get input from individuals and organisation that put themselves forward for the NNS grants for voting neurons elections (of which CodeGov grabbed every single possible grant).
cc @WaterNeuron, @zenithcode, @louisevelayo, @quint, @krzysztofzelazko, @Jesse, @jaesharma, @zohaib29, there are many more…
I would add...
I would add that it’s worth remembering that the first question that practically every new member asks when joining the NNS, or an SNS DAO is, ‘what’s the dev neuron’? or ‘what’s a quick an easy neuron I can follow for everything?’. A DAO-controlled neuron allows them to say ‘hey, I’ve not got time to go in-depth on this, I hereby donate my VP to the DAO (for as long as I decide to follow the DAO-controlled neuron) so that the active and diligent members can distribute that VP with careful intent’