I have repeatedly said we are all here for personal gain, myself included, I do not think that is a bad impulse at all. And I did not specify anything about you except as part of a wider group, I don’t know why you are choosing to take this personally.
Anyway, I should not have returned to this forum, it was a mistake. I remember seeing a thread about deleting accounts but cannot find it. If I recall correctly, certain site mods can do it. Apologies for putting the here instead of the appropriate thread, but @diegop could I request you to delete my Dfinity forum account when you have time?
I responded originally, as you quoted me, implying you’re speaking about my statement, then proceeded to claim that this topic was raised for personal gain when it’s been shown that’s not the case.
I am not sure why you so consistently assert this narrative upon me when I have made it very clear I am in favour of decreasing inflation & APY in general.
I’ll make a couple of comments, and I’ll note that I have some direct experience in trying to enact something like this(for better or worse):
I absolutely think that the curve for the voting power bonus should be exponential in nature.
Given that there are(I think) still some approved proposals that have taken more than a year and still have not been implemented I’m hesitant to reduce the minimum staking at which you get rewards below six months. In a perfect “skin in the game” world you’d be locked until at least the things you approve have been enacted. That is not practical, so we use time periods to keep it simpler…but I’m really not in favor of 1 day unless there is actually a negative bonus below a certain point(and it is negative exponential)…even then I’m tempted to say it breaks long term optimal decision making at the aggregate network level.
If you are going to change it you should either grandfather in existing neurons or let everyone dissolve and restake. Given the current economic conditions, I’d say grandfathering would be the way to go, but you’d likely have to remove automatic restaking for those grandfathered neurons.
I agree. They started when you attacked @Denis for no good reason. If you keep attacking people when they contribute to the conversation, then you will continue getting one sided feedback. Just let it go when people say something that rubs you the wrong way. You will be more successful engaging community discussion if you avoid accusations, anger, and angst.
Attacked? You need to take a serious look at your critical thinking skills.
Your narratives are unproductive to the conversation & detract from your reputation as a governance contributor - what is the purpose of your comments other than attempting to reprimand me? You’re beyond transparent.
Your lack of preaching of this “anger angst accusation” to those of whom actually actively fall within this category, such as @Denis & his unfounded accusations, transparently showcase your bias.
I’d appreciate if you stopped attempting to circumvent this topic, as you have so frequently done with spam comments that take conversations off-topic in the past.
I think we all need to think about the current situation.
We have a really unattractive unnecessarily risky staking/governance system. We can all think of cool ways forcing people to be long term investors but in the state ICP is currently in only crazy people would be long term investors.
We need to lower the risk to be a part of this community and make everything more attractive to the average crypto investor.
Im sure a lot of people who drank some really good coolaid will tell me that they don’t want crypto people, to that i say same thing I always say. Don’t worry if we keep things the way they are no one will join to mess up your safe space.
It will be all 30 community devs and dfinity employees pretending they are making something until the token collapses.
I agree, I am transparent. I will always stand up for civilized conversation.
My intent is not to reprimand, but rather to encourage you to think about how you talk to people and how it impacts the conversation. You have the ability to make strong governance contributions, but you tend to undermine your own capability with wild accusations and angry responses. Just relax and let other people have an opinion that is different than your own.
why can’t this be market based. if icp prices keeps going down over 4 week period the short term should offer higher rate (curve more flat/elastic), if prices going up the curve is less flat (inelastic). u can use the same modulation logic that is used for the maturity pay outs perhaps as that tracks price over some time period as I recall.