Node Provider Rewards : 500k * 7/30 = 116,666 ICP. (500k may be a low estimate for the month)
25k of the 72k was mine, and I locked it straight back up in gifts for people. I’m sure the swamp know this they’re just selective with their evidence.
So far this month, 71% of the inflation has come from Node Provider Rewards.
… and the Swamp are doing everything they can to still take from the 8 year stakers.
This is concrete and alarming….something that should be discussed objectively with an eye towards solutions. There are solutions to this issue. Many in fact…I reject that doing nothing and watching ICP die is a viable course.
I will be starting a bountied discussion on TACO DAO in the very near future about what the best course of action might be. We need to compensate node providers in a way that decentralizes the network without killing price. I’m excited to see what the DAO comes up with and I hope Dfinity considers our proposals objectively.
Why are there so many node providers that receive rewards for 28+ nodes when only 1 or 2 is assigned? Edit: there is even one provider receiving rewards for 28 nodes with ZERO assigned.
I understand there must be a need for back up machines but 50% of the network is these backups.
More shameless plugging: You can verify what i’m saying and verify @borovan claims for node providers rewards by viewing their deposit accounts at npgeek.
Thats nothing, node rewards in 1 month is 475k ICP, Maturity is 2.28mil ICP in 1 month. Minted ICP from maturity is about 900k per month. 1/3 inflation comes from node providers. As long as maturity is that high, ICP wont gain any token value.
Dfinity is selling about 1.5mil ICP per month from ghost unlocked neurons. 2.87mil ICP sell pressure every month.
I believe in free markets where people can buy / sell and transfer. Adam is an individual and I wont bother chasing down your facts since we can’t control individuals.
We do, collectively, control how the Internet Computer works and how it incentivizes different behaviors among the different parties involved.
Right now node providers are incentivized to dump and short ICP because they have no ‘skin in the game’ when it comes to ICP price. Their rewards are fixed in USD terms and I bear them no ill will since they are just behaving rationally by hedging their future rewards against future price decreases.
It seems to me that Node Providers who believe in ICP could be convinced to stake an 8 year neuron worth ~1-3 years of rewards that they would be paid. I know a number of 8 year neuron holders who would love to have had the returns that node providers have enjoyed over the last couple of years.
A simpler solution would be to just slash the rewards amount - less to dump…
It was because Aviate Labs and Wenzel masterminded a change to the tokenomics where the maximum per Node Provider was reduced to 42. They moved 28 from many reputable providers to shell companies owned by the swamp.
They’re not needed right now, they shouldn’t have been allowed to do it. They’re going to kill ICP if we don’t stop them.
If this is true than Borovan is trolling everyone. I remember He told that He has about 10% VP, it makes His income about 7600 ICP per day. That wallet cluster has similar reward data.
I hope for all of our sakes that this is not a deliberate plan but simply an oversight and something that can be corrected. But it appears to me that we are overpaying service providers who are providing services without the requisite demand.
What scam you talking about, you only dont like inflation, pump ICP to 50 usd and node rewards are only 47.5k ICP, but maturity is still 2.2mil ICP and over 1mil will be minted from it.
I personally think this would be a dangerous approach, and a bad precedent. I think it’s good to have an open discussion about all the options though.
I think the staking solution you mentioned is the right way to go for numerous reasons.
Recently rewards boosts were introduced for node providers who would establish/relocate nodes in under-represented countries. I believe that instead of this, there should have been a reward boost mechanism for node providers who opt to stake a significant portion of their rewards automatically on an ongoing basis into a slashable neuron.
I hope this is the direction that we go in. It seems to be part of the plan laid out by DFINITY. I’m not sure why they’ve been silent on it recently though (no idea what the timeframe for introducing this approach is).