Proposal: Update Interim Gen-1 Node Provider Remuneration After 48 months

Proposal #134925 Review — Louise | Aviate Labs

Vote: ADOPT
Review:

  • Though this proposal appears to add 28 nodes, the proposer clarified that this is necessary for migrating to the HSM-less deployment method in their statement on the wiki. Once the nodes have transitioned to the new Node Operator (NO) record, the old one will be deprecated. This keeps aligned with the IC target topology.
  • The DC ID in the proposal matches what is displayed on the dashboard.
  • This data center hosts nodes for the node provider Bigger Capital, with the node provider ID 7a4u2-gevsy-5c5fs-hsgri-n2kdz-dxxwf-btcfp-jykro-l4y7c-7xky2-aqe.
  • The previous NO ID (codio-e5e6p-ol6sn-o3mgw-r7v5p-4jmch-a7exl-7pifz-cw4gn-ah47y-6ae) associated with this data center shows 28 nodes, matching the allowance being proposed. The old NO ID also mentions the same NP ID as stated in the previous point.
  • The old NO ID also verifies that these are Gen-1 nodes as indicated by the "type1": 28, meaning that they are in line with motion proposal 132553 for node rewards after 48 months. This proposal is explained at the beginning of this forum thread.
  • For the reasons above, I vote to Adopt

Additional Comments
As noted by @LaCosta , the hashes appear to be incorrect. However, given that this is not a criteria that is usually checked for this proposal type (referring to this post), I would still vote to adopt. @kennethwwu , please make sure to correct the documentation that you have posted on the wiki. You can either find and upload the documents that produce the hash you have published, or, update the hash on wiki.

About Aviate Labs

Aviate Labs is a team dedicated to supporting node providers since 2020. Our mission is to make high-performance infrastructure management on the Internet Computer (ICP) as seamless as possible, while adhering to the principles of decentralization.

We are known for our contributions to the ecosystem, including the go-agent and developer work packages on GitHub, as well as the Node Monitor tool, which alerts Node Providers as soon as any of their nodes go down.

In the NNS, our team—Roald, Louise, and Quint—reviews and votes independently on ‘Node Admin’ and ‘Participant Management’ proposals. Currently we don’t vote at all on other proposals.

The Aviate Labs known neuron is configured to follow our team for these topics and other trusted entities for broader proposals. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee, committed to voting on every proposal and supporting decentralization within the ICP ecosystem.

2 Likes