Hey @infu. I did a little more research to get exact numbers. It appears that WaterNeuron directly controls 0.8% total voting power in the NNS and it triggers about 1% total voting power in the NNS (about 0.2% from followers).
Are you suggesting that WaterNeuron should own more than 1 NNS known neuron? How would NNS voters decide which one to follow? Again, the amount of NNS total voting power that the WaterNeuron known neuron controls directly is only 0.8% VP today. Do you want to split that into smaller chunks? Why?
The WaterNeuron known neuron triggers about 1% total voting power in the NNS today. Hence, there isn’t a lot of additional voting power following WaterNeuron other than what WaterNeuron controls directly. In the event that this grows in the future, it should be noted that splitting the WaterNeuron voting power into smaller chunks cannot affect the followers of WaterNeuron at all.
Recently it appeared that WaterNeuron was triggering about 2% total voting power in the NNS, but that could have been influenced by some large neurons following both WaterNeuron and CodeGov or it could be that some larger neurons recently decided to stop following WaterNeuron. I didn’t realize that had changed slightly. Anyway, the data in this post is now corrected.
(1.7M VP 6mo + 1.4M VP 8yr) / 385.3M TVP = 0.8% VP