This makes sense, but I think there needs to be consistency. If SetupOS changes are to be included in GuestOS proposal change logs, and HostOS is a dependency of SetupOS, then HostOS changes should also always be included in GuestOS proposal change logs (even though HostOS isn’t the deployment target).
This reminds me of a Zoom chat we had a little while ago @sat, where @andrewbattat’s very insightful suggestion came up.
How close are we away from something like this? As we discussed, it wouldn’t matter if there are no plans to deploy the elected HostOS changes (immediately). It would be more about giving NNS voters frequent and consistent oversight (and a say) in the HostOS changes that are taking place.