Proposal to elect new release rc--2024-07-18_01-30--github

Governance
,
3

I also just noticed the unelection component to this proposal (I got wrapped up with the above).

Based on IC-OS election proposal history, there currently appear to be 11 blessed replica versions registered, 5 of which would be unelected by this proposal (if it executes).

I’ve listed these below, ordered by elected date, and crossed out the versions that would be unelected.

  • e3fca54, elected 2024-06-24 (proposal 130727), UNELECTION PROPOSED, running on 0 subnets
  • ae3c4f3, elected 2024-06-24 (proposal 130728), UNELECTION PROPOSED, running on 0 subnets
  • 9c006a5, elected 2024-06-25 (proposal 130748), UNELECTION PROPOSED, running on 0 subnets
  • 2e269c7, elected 2024-07-01 (proposal 130818), UNELECTION PROPOSED, running on 0 subnets
  • b6c3687, elected 2024-07-01 (proposal 130819), UNELECTION PROPOSED, running on 0 subnets
  • e4eeb33, elected 2024-07-08 (proposal 130984), running on 0 subnets
  • 5849c6d, elected 2024-07-08 (proposal 130985), running on 0 subnets
  • 16fabfd, elected 2024-07-11 (proposal 131028), running on 0 subnets
  • 7dee901, elected 2024-07-11 (proposal 131032), running on 1 subnets
  • a3831c8, elected 2024-07-15 (proposal 131054), running on 36 subnets
  • 0d2b396, elected 2024-07-15 (proposal 131055), running on 0 subnets

Can I ask why the e4eeb33, 5849c6d and 16fabfd aren’t being unelected (they’re no longer running on any subnets either)? It’s also interesting that 0d2b396 has never been deployed to a subnet (but was elected earlier in the week). This is just a matter of curiousity :slightly_smiling_face:

1 Like