[Proposal] Defining An Ethos For The NNS

yes of course I follow this →

Funny how I had to go through so many sites to register for an event which I didn’t end up attending.

Certainly, seems like being vigilant about a blockchain governance system such as NNS is a full-time job without pay. Especially after the tokenomics fiasco that DFINITY cooked up with ICPMN.

IMO,a good blockchain is one that requires the least amount of human intervention via governance. A working group meeting every 4-6 weeks seems weak. By introducing governance working groups, you are forcing participants such as I to take part in it or miss out on the development. Also in my opinion, there is no need for a ‘working group’ for governance if it can meet every week. This, however, is my two cents.

And yes, I was criticizing dfinity in general on how it interacts with the community. Is DFINITY blind to the rest of the world, or is it only in favor of ICPMN?

Read this post on how DFINITY is obscuring information wrt governance →

I don’t understand why anyone would trust this forum or DFINITY after all the bad faith practices DFINITY is engaging in along with ICPMN. Apparently, this nonprofit organization is good at picking sides instead of being neutral.

DFINITY has a broken grant system, broken comms, broken governance, and a terrible reputation among the web3 community to top it off.