IC security according to Copilot AI: 6-7 out of 10

This is what people see when they research Copilot about IC security. Isn’t it scary for new developpers?

Sent by Copilot:

The security of the Internet Computer Protocol (ICP) blockchain can be considered around a 6 or 7 out of 10. Here are some key points to consider:

Independent Subnets: ICP operates with independent subnets rather than a single blockchain, which can be a double-edged sword. While this design helps with scalability, it also means each subnet can be a potential target if compromised.

Validator Nodes: Each subnet relies on a limited number of validators, sometimes as few as 13 nodes. [This relatively small number can make the subnets more vulnerable to attacks]
(Diving Deep into ICP's Blockchain Risks and Governance - OneSafe Blog).

Canister Security**: ICP canisters, which are smart contracts on the network, have unique security challenges. Developers need to be proactive in securing these canisters to prevent unauthorized access and ensure correct execution2.

Risk Management: ICP’s architecture reduces certain risks, such as contagion risks, by not relying on shared security models. However, this also means it doesn’t benefit from the additional security resources that shared models provide.

Overall, while ICP has some innovative features and potential, its security model has areas that need careful attention and improvement. If you’re considering investing or developing on ICP, it’s crucial to stay informed about these aspects and follow best practices for security.

1 Like

The source aeticle ia written by AI using Bons thread.

1 Like