Other aspects to IC OS proposals that haven’t yet been mentioned include unelections, e.g. →
To my knowledge, this aspect is currently not a feature of other reviews. Issues here have caused proposal execution failures in the past.
Are you able to clarify what you mean (is this something that other reviews could improve on, such as the other reviews for that same proposal)?
I rejected 5 IC OS proposals last month due to inaccurate proposal summaries (regarding which commits were included). Even the 2 proposals that I adopted had inaccuracies (though less significant ones, which is why I adopted).
This is still the case, but it’s slowly getting better. We need reviewers to be putting the pressure on - not just me. I personally think there’s a long way to go though (the issues and recommendations described in the ‘Do U C What IC’ article are still just as relevant today).