Morning/Afternoon/evening Those interested in contributing sns is live https://nns.ic0.app/project/?project=bu3tj-cqaaa-aaaaq-aafdq-cai
@ICPMintToday promoting Doxa, few bucks for a soul. If people remember they did promoted many Scott Summer rug projects.
@Henn91 Remember we are a registered foundation that has stood the test of time, 3 years and we didnt scatter. Soon the whole icp will be here.You will be among the people who missed out trust me
letâs see some details on this please
Itâs easy to say, but specifically where and how? Who decides, and what is the process they use?
Whatâs the plan for future updates and confirmed usage of the funds?
This feels very lightweight to me
lmao please stop with this scam, nobody believes a single word of what youâre saying lmaooooooooooooooooo
Hey - Iâd appreciate some answers; in comparison to what your SNS has reached so far, I am a whale.
Whales wanna know: miss out on what?
Governance of a stable coin? Oh no!
This project is talking a lot of marketing speak and not much sense
Actually we shall be reaching out to street children in Katwe and Kisenyi, Downtown Kampala
Fair questions and honestly,
When we say âdonât miss out,â weâre not talking about simply owning governance over a stablecoin. The bigger opportunity is being early in the infrastructure weâre building around DoxaUSD: stablecoin payments, cross-chain liquidity, AI-agent payments, and eventually a multi-currency stablecoin ecosystem built on ICP.
And youâre right that marketing can sometimes get ahead of the actual product. Thatâs something weâre conscious of. So rather than asking anyone to believe the vision, weâd rather be judged by what we ship.
DoxaUSD is already the starting point. The SNS is a mechanism to put the project in the hands of the community and fund the next stage of execution.
If youâre a whale, the question probably shouldnât be âhow much DOXA can I get?â it should be whether you believe this infrastructure can become meaningful enough to matter. Weâre willing to prove that with execution.
Via what Charity? And how is this verifiable either now or in the future?
Youâre not saying âtrust me broâ I trust?
unverifiable philanthropy.
The language of ânoble causesâ and âdecentralisationâ obscuring a highly speculative and poorly optimized financial product.
Where are the DETAILS?
We shall post pictures bro. Dont worry about thisâŚOur product will be the best in icp just give it time bro
This answer could not be less reassuring.
Pictures are not proof - you sound like there is no actual verifiable mechanism.
please be honest.
DOXA absolutely smacks of another SNS cashgrab disaster.
Hi @SumMonsterism have we ever grabbed anybodys? cash by the time dfinity trusts you with two grants it knows you can deliver. If you are investing please do rather than spoiling our name with what you dont have evidence of
Theyâve already got away with it.
TAGGR: POST #1459559 BY @LORIMER
They only have to chuck in a few ICP and they fully own all funds committed by participants, which I highly suspect they will run off with (they certainly arenât going to raise enough to deliver on what theyâre trying to sell).
Oh, I wouldnât say that, mate.
They already raised over 300 ICP
Thatâs a lotta money
Anybody could believe it, really
I recall he started smallâŚ
He had to sell a doxa or twoâŚ
So hereâs the thing mate - Youâre asking people to trust you with their funds.
Me asking quite legitimate questions shouldnât be fobbed off with accusations that Iâm spoiling (assuming you mean tarnishing, btw) your name.
You should be able to stand up to scrutiny.
If thereâs no plan with which youâll be divesting funds to âneedy folksâ SNS particpants should be told that.
just handing it (other peopleâs money!) out willy-nilly makes it sound like a cash-grab.
Let me know exactly where any of these points are defamatory, or wrong and Iâll be happy to apologise.
Thing is - the more you canât respond with facts, or bat away questions with meritless accusations, the more it sounds like thereâs:
A) no forethought (that has clear ramifications for the rest of the project)
and
B) Itâs a cash grab
and then weâre left with the question of why the IC needs another wrapped layer on top of #ckUSDC
âŚbut thatâs for more technical friends than this holder
I donât think many people care, so I guess we just take it easy and see how it plays out.
Its pure scam, this is why they added 100 ICP minimum goal. If it would be real project, they should have built running project that has users/volume, AND than set minimum target for 50k ICP.
Right now they get like 500 ICP, tell us it failed and never see Him again, and same with ICP that people put in.
at this point, itâs natural selection. Whoever âinvestsâ in this mudhut tier scam deserves to lose it.
h i l a r i o u s
frightening isnât it.
SNS gonna bite people who donât DYOR
Thatâs a strong word mate
Nobody wouldnât say that.