Proposal 132147 doesn’t seem like an improvement over proposal 132091.
I know LTC is not an ERC20 token, but this thread linked below provides an example of the type of detail that you might want to consider putting into the proposal. The first attempt at ckOCT didn’t pass, but that was because there wasn’t a lot of clarity offered on what to look for in the proposal. It was the first time the community attempted to create a ckERC20 token, so it took extra effort. However, the discussion clearly shows the support and interest that DFINITY and others in the community have for people who want to take action to launch these ck tokens.
Please note in the case of ckERC20 tokens, it is not a Governance Motion proposal that is submitted, but instead it is a System Canister Management proposal. This type of proposal can be submitted by the community for any ERC20 token to create the ckERC20 twin.
I don’t know the status of being able to do the same for LTC, but surely it will require much more discussion and a stronger case for DFINITY to commit resources to making it happen. They have to prioritize ckLTC among other tokens such as ckSOL, etc.
Good luck on this new version of your proposal @Henry_Suso, but if it doesn’t pass again then I hope this feedback helps for the next attempt.