Committee Neurons

Governance
81

I’m not sure that I’m all caught up on the feedback, but here are some of my initial thoughts:

  1. I am very COLD in the idea of compensating anyone for their participation out of a shared pool because it creates attack vectors for spam. I’ve proposed shifting to voter based pools here and I still think it is a good idea because it allows us to put weights back in and encourage decentralization while funding a dev or NNS treasury with the forfeited inflation(or burn it) Proposal to covert from system based reward to voter based reward; to implement an accept quorum mechanism; and to return the reject cost to 1 ICP . I don’t want career politicians in the NNS voting to perpetuate the system. If you want to incentivize them, give them locked neurons and the market will take care of the in incentives.(ICDevs model)…if we want to continue to exist then we need to make ICP fly)

  2. I don’t see why we don’t just use the current system. How would this be different than adding new topics that you could delegate your votes to? Topic is an int32 which gives us the ability to have 2B of them. We could add an extensible proposal variant and have an NNS function that creates/retires them as necessary. We already have weights so we can incentivize voters to select a delegate and when “change your vote” is implemented we have a built in citizen veto.

  3. I think this is a UI problem. Make new topics/creating named neurons/selecting and advertising delegates easy and I think the system will self assemble.

More thoughts later. Great topic and direction Jordan….let’s find an mvp with the parts already laying around.

9 Likes